...
首页> 外文期刊>ACS Omega >Comparison between Nucleate Pool Boiling Heat Transfer of Graphene Nanoplatelet- and Carbon Nanotube- Based Aqueous Nanofluids
【24h】

Comparison between Nucleate Pool Boiling Heat Transfer of Graphene Nanoplatelet- and Carbon Nanotube- Based Aqueous Nanofluids

机译:石墨烯纳米片和碳纳米管基纳米水流的核池沸腾传热比较

获取原文
           

摘要

An increase of nucleate pool boiling with the use of different fluid properties has received much attention. In particular, the presence of nanostructures in fluids to enhance boiling was given special consideration. This study compares the effects of graphene nanoplatelet (GNP), functionalized GNP with polyethylene glycol (PEG), and multiwalled carbon nanotube (CNT) nanofluids on the pool boiling heat transfer coefficient and the critical heat flux (CHF). Our findings showed that at the same concentration, CHF for functionalized GNP with PEG (GNP–PEG)/deionized water (DW) nanofluids was higher in comparison with GNP- and CNT-based nanofluids. The CHF of the GNP/DW nanofluids was also higher than that of CNT/DW nanofluids. The CHF of GNP–PEG was 72% greater than that of DW at the concentration of 0.1 wt %. There is good agreement between measured critical heat fluxes and the Kandlikar correlation. In addition, the current results proved that the GNP–PEG/DW nanofluids are highly stable over 3 months at a concentration of 0.1 wt %.
机译:随着流体性质的不同,成核池沸腾的增加已引起广泛关注。尤其要特别考虑到流体中存在纳米结构以增强沸腾。这项研究比较了石墨烯纳米血小板(GNP),带有聚乙二醇的功能化GNP(PEG)和多壁碳纳米管(CNT)纳米流体对池沸腾传热系数和临界热通量(CHF)的影响。我们的研究结果表明,在相同浓度下,与基于GNP和CNT的纳米流体相比,具有PEG(GNP–PEG)/去离子水(DW)纳米流体的功能化GNP的CHF更高。 GNP / DW纳米流体的CHF也高于CNT / DW纳米流体的CHF。在0.1 wt%的浓度下,GNP–PEG的CHF比DW高72%。测得的临界热通量与Kandlikar相关性之间有很好的一致性。此外,目前的结果证明,GNP-PEG / DW纳米流体在0.1重量%的浓度下可在3个月内高度稳定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号