首页> 外文期刊>Advances in Meteorology >Comparison of Cloud Base Height Derived from a Ground-Based Infrared Cloud Measurement and Two Ceilometers
【24h】

Comparison of Cloud Base Height Derived from a Ground-Based Infrared Cloud Measurement and Two Ceilometers

机译:地基红外云测量和两个云高仪得出的云底高度的比较

获取原文
       

摘要

The cloud base height (CBH) derived from the whole-sky infrared cloud-measuring system (WSIRCMS) and two ceilometers (Vaisala CL31 and CL51) from November 1, 2011, to June 12, 2012, at the Chinese Meteorological Administration (CMA) Beijing Observatory Station are analysed. Significant differences can be found by comparing the measurements of different instruments. More exactly, the cloud occurrence retrieved from CL31 is 3.8% higher than that from CL51, while WSIRCMS data shows 3.6% higher than ceilometers. More than 75.5% of the two ceilometers’ differences are within ±200 m and about 89.5% within ±500 m, while only 30.7% of the differences between WSIRCMS and ceilometers are within ±500 m and about 55.2% within ±1000 m. These differences may be caused by the measurement principles and CBH retrieval algorithm. A combination of a laser ceilometer and an infrared cloud instrument is recommended to improve the capability for determining cloud occurrence and retrieving CBHs.
机译:从2011年11月1日至2012年6月12日,中国气象局(CMA)的全天红外云测量系统(WSIRCMS)和两个云高仪(维萨拉CL31和CL51)得出的云底高度(CBH)。对北京天文台站进行了分析。通过比较不同仪器的测量结果,可以发现明显的差异。更准确地说,从CL31检索到的云出现比从CL51检索到的云发生高3.8%,而WSIRCMS数据显示比云高仪高3.6%。两种云高仪之间的差异中,超过75.5%的误差在±200µm内,在±500μm内的差异约占89.5%,而WSIRCMS和云高仪之间的差异仅在±500μm内,而在±1000μm内的差异约55.2%。这些差异可能是由测量原理和CBH检索算法引起的。建议将激光云高仪和红外云仪器结合使用,以提高确定云发生和检索CBH的能力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号