...
首页> 外文期刊>Advances in Medical Education and Practice >Learning styles among first professional northern and central India medical students during digitization
【24h】

Learning styles among first professional northern and central India medical students during digitization

机译:数字化期间印度北部和中部的第一批专业医学生的学习方式

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Learning style is an individual’s natural or habitual pattern of acquiring and processing information in learning situations. Different sensory modalities are used by different types of medical students for assimilating the knowledge and information. Currently, the usage of electronic tools for teaching is widespread that can influence learning styles. Methods: The purpose of this study was to know the pattern of learners among first- and second-year medical students from different institutions in India. For this purpose, we have used latest English Version 7.0 of the Visual-Aural-Read/write-Kinesthetic. Results: Analysis was carried out using the IBM SPSS Version 21 software. Numerical variables were summarized by mean and SD or median and IQR as appropriate. Differences in scores among Visual-Aural-Read/write-Kinesthetic-learning styles were tested by Friedman’s test with post hoc pair wise comparison. Pattern of learning styles was different, and it was statistically significant ( P 0.001). In this study, aural (median score 6) and kinesthetic (median score 6) styles were preferred. Pair-wise comparisons revealed that each style was different from each other except kinesthetic and aural. Conclusion: Results of the study suggest that to improve learning, one should try to use multimodal styles with special emphasis given to auditory and kinesthetic modes especially among first professionals in medical education during digitization.
机译:背景:学习风格是个人在学习环境中获取和处理信息的一种自然或习惯方式。不同类型的医学生使用不同的感觉方式来吸收知识和信息。当前,电子工具在教学中的使用已很广泛,这会影响学习方式。方法:本研究的目的是了解来自印度不同机构的一年级和二年级医学生的学习者模式。为此,我们使用了最新的英语版本7.0的Visual-Aural-Read / write-Kinesthetic。结果:使用IBM SPSS 21版软件进行了分析。数值变量通过均值和SD或中位数和IQR进行汇总。视觉听觉读/写动觉学习风格之间的分数差异通过弗里德曼测验与事后成对比较进行了测验。学习风格的模式是不同的,并且具有统计学意义(P <0.001)。在这项研究中,听觉(中位数6)和动觉(中位数6)风格是首选。逐对比较显示,除了动觉和听觉之外,每种风格都彼此不同。结论:研究结果表明,为了改善学习,人们应该尝试使用多模式方式,尤其是听觉和动觉方式,特别是在数字化医学教育的第一批专业人员中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号