...
首页> 外文期刊>Acute Medicine & Surgery >Potential role for emergency physicians with endoscopy training in the treatment of upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage: a retrospective observational study
【24h】

Potential role for emergency physicians with endoscopy training in the treatment of upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage: a retrospective observational study

机译:接受内镜检查培训的急诊医师在治疗上消化道出血中的潜在作用:一项回顾性观察研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Aim Urgent endoscopy is essential in gastrointestinal ( GI ) bleeding. Emergency physicians with endoscopy training treat patients with GI bleeding in our hospital. We compared the management and clinical outcomes of GI bleeding cases between those treated by an emergency physician ( EP ) and those treated by a non‐emergency physician ( NEP ; e.g., gastroenterologist or general surgeon). Methods We undertook a retrospective chart review of upper GI bleeding cases treated using endoscopy in the emergency department between 2012 and 2014. We examined patients characteristics, endoscopic findings, hemostatic procedures, need for transfusion, rebleeding and adverse events, length of hospital stay, and mortality. Results The EP group included 33 patients (39%) and the NEP group included 51 (61%). Patient characteristics and diseases did not differ between the groups. The EP group underwent urgent endoscopy more often (100% versus 86%, P = 0.04). Procedure times were not statistically different between the groups. The EP group had fewer hemostatic procedures (42% versus 65%, P = 0.04). Transfusion requirements were lower in the EP group (0.5 U versus 2.1 U, P = 0.006). There were no statistical differences in rebleeding and adverse events. The length of hospital stay was shorter (8 versus 11 days, P = 0.03) and the in‐hospital mortality rate was lower in the EP group (0% versus 13.7%, P = 0.04). Conclusion Short‐term outcomes in GI bleeding cases managed by emergency physicians with endoscopy training were comparable to those by gastroenterologists and general surgeons. However, the extent of endoscopic training and experience emergency physicians should have remains unclear. Urgent endoscopy is essential in gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. Upper GI endoscopy services are not readily available or affordable for many patients in some countries. Short‐term outcomes in GI bleeding cases managed by emergency physicians with endoscopy training were comparable to those by gastroenterologists and general surgeons.
机译:目的急诊内窥镜检查对于胃肠道(GI)出血至关重要。接受内镜检查培训的急诊医师在我院治疗胃肠道出血的患者。我们比较了急诊医师(EP)和非急诊医师(NEP;例如肠胃科医生或普通外科医师)治疗的胃肠道出血病例的管理和临床结局。方法我们回顾性回顾了2012年至2014年间在急诊室使用内窥镜检查治疗的上消化道出血病例。我们检查了患者的特征,内窥镜检查结果,止血方法,输血需求,再出血和不良事件,住院时间以及死亡。结果EP组33例,占39%; NEP组51例,占61%。两组之间的患者特征和疾病没有差异。 EP组更常接受紧急内镜检查(100%比86%,P = 0.04)。两组之间的手术时间无统计学差异。 EP组止血程序较少(42%对65%,P = 0.04)。 EP组的输血要求较低(0.5 U比2.1 U,P = 0.006)。再出血和不良事件无统计学差异。 EP组的住院时间较短(8天比11天,P = 0.03),EP组的院内死亡率较低(0%对13.7%,P = 0.04)。结论由接受内镜检查的急诊医师处理的胃肠道出血病例的短期结局与胃肠病医生和普通外科医师的近期结局相当。但是,内镜训练的程度和急诊医师的经验尚不清楚。紧急内窥镜检查对于胃肠道(GI)出血至关重要。在某些国家/地区,许多患者无法获得上消化道内窥镜检查服务或无法负担得起。由急诊医师进行内窥镜检查培训的胃肠道出血病例的短期结局与胃肠病医生和普通外科医师的近期结局相当。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号