...
首页> 外文期刊>Acta Zoologica Mexicana >Gamma diversity: derived from and a determinant of Alpha diversity and Beta diversity. An analysis of three tropical landscapes
【24h】

Gamma diversity: derived from and a determinant of Alpha diversity and Beta diversity. An analysis of three tropical landscapes

机译:伽玛多样性:源自和决定阿尔法多样性和Beta多样性。三种热带景观分析

获取原文

摘要

Using three taxonomic groups of beetles we examine how alpha and beta diversity influence the species richness of a landscape (gamma diversity), and vice versa. That is, how the species richness of a landscape - which is a historical and biogeographical phenomenon - contributes to the values of alpha diversity (1) at a given site, (2) in a community, (3) in terms of cumulative species richness by community, and also contributes to (4) the intensity of species exchange between communities. To explore this question, we used two subfamilies of Scarabaeoidea: Scarabaeinae and Geotrupinae, and the family Silphidae. In all analyses these three taxonomic groups are considered as a single indicator group: the copronecrophagous beetles. Information is also included on the subfamily Aphodiinae (Scarabaeoidea), coprophagous beetles not included in the indicator group. Several types of vegetation located in three landscapes (tropical, transition and mountain) were studied, and these are located along an altitudinal gradient in the central part of the state of Veracruz, Mexico. We base this study on the following concepts. The alpha diversity of an indicator group reflects the number of species that use a given environment or resource in a given place or community. Spacial beta diversity is related to the response of organisms to spatial heterogeneity. Gamma diversity depends primarily on the historical and geographic processes that operate on the mesoscale level and is also affected by alpha and beta diversity. It is on this scale of landscape that human actions, such as the modification and fragmentation of vegetation, have their most important effects. These are, however, often beyond the scope of ecological analyses carried out on a local scale. In the three landscapes, sampling was carried out regularly at 67 sites, with complementary sampling at another 69 sites. Twenty-six types of vegetation communities were studied. A total of 16,152 specimens representing 60 species were captured (52 species of Scarabaeinae, 4 Geotrupinae and 4 Silphidae). In the tropical landscape the community richest in species was low deciduous forest. In the transition landscape, cloud forest was the richest. Each of these communities is the most representative of their respective altitudinal bands. In contrast, the greatest species richness in the mountain landscape occurred in the mountain grasslands and pastures; types of community favoured by or even created by human intervention. This is explained by the expansion of heliophilous species from the Mexican High Plateau into these areas. In the tropical landscape the species richness of the pastures is similar to that of its forests, but with a partially different composition which is characterized by the dominance of heliophilous and coprophagous species; the latter, in addition to the more ubiquitous species that are shared with the tropical forest. In the transition landscape the cloud forest and the coffee plantations with polyspecific shade are important in the context of conserving the fauna. This type of community offers arboreal cover and occupies the majority of this landscape, allowing the groups of insects studied to move between remnant fragments of cloud forest. On the landscape scale but not locally, the fragmentation of natural communities does not appear to have reduced the number of species for the beetles of the indicator group. In each landscape disturbance by human activity appears to have been overcome for distinct reasons. In the tropical landscape we find the heliophilous beetle fauna characteristic of pastures, and this has increased by two species of recent invaders. In the transition landscape, the coffee plantations with polyspecific shade create a communication matrix, while in the mountain landscape the expansion of the mountain pastures has made conditions more favourable for heliophilous species. These results are not necessarily expected for other groups of organisms.
机译:使用三类甲虫分类学,我们研究了α和β多样性如何影响景观物种丰富度(γ多样性),反之亦然。就是说,景观的物种丰富度-是一种历史和生物地理现象-是如何在给定地点的(1),(2)社区中(3)累积物种丰富度的基础上提高alpha多样性的值的(4)加强社区之间物种交换的强度。为了探讨这个问题,我们使用了金龟子亚科的两个亚科:金龟子科和地龙科,以及Sil科。在所有分析中,这三个分类组被视为一个指标组:食相甲虫。信息还包括Aphodiinae(Scarabaeoidea)亚科,共生的甲虫,未包括在指标组中。对位于三种景观(热带,过渡和山区)的几种植被进行了研究,这些植被沿海拔梯度分布在墨西哥韦拉克鲁斯州中部。我们基于以下概念进行这项研究。指标组的alpha多样性反映了在给定地点或社区中使用给定环境或资源的物种的数量。空间β多样性与生物体对空间异质性的反应有关。伽玛多样性主要取决于在中尺度水平上运行的历史和地理过程,并且还受到alpha和beta多样性的影响。在这种景观规模上,人类活动(例如植被的改变和破碎)具有最重要的影响。但是,这些往往超出了在当地进行的生态分析的范围。在这三个景观中,定期在67个地点进行采样,并在另外69个地点进行补充采样。研究了26种植被群落。总共捕获了代表16种物种的16,152个标本(金龟子科52种,地龙科4种和飞虱科4种)。在热带地区,物种最丰富的社区是低落叶森林。在过渡景观中,云林最为丰富。这些社区中的每一个都是各自海拔带的最有代表性的。相反,山地景观中物种丰富度最大的地区是山地草原和牧场。人类干预所支持甚至创造的社区类型。嗜盐菌物种从墨西哥高原进入这些地区的原因可以解释。在热带景观中,牧场的物种丰富度与其森林相似,但组成部分不同,其特征是嗜食性和共食性物种占优势。后者,以及与热带森林共享的更普遍的物种。在过渡景观中,云母林和具有多特定阴影的咖啡种植园对于保护动物群非常重要。这种类型的群落提供树木覆盖,并占据了该景观的大部分,从而使研究的昆虫群体在云雾森林的残余碎片之间移动。在景观规模上,但在局部范围内,自然群落的分裂似乎并未减少该指标组甲虫的物种数量。在每个景观中,人类活动造成的干扰似乎都有不同的原因可以克服。在热带景观中,我们发现了牧场具有嗜盐性的甲虫动物区系,并且这已增加了两种新近入侵者。在过渡景观中,具有多特定阴影的咖啡种植园创建了一个沟通矩阵,而在高山景观中,高山牧场的扩张使条件更加适合嗜油性物种。对于其他类型的生物,这些结果不一定是预期的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号