...
首页> 外文期刊>Cost Effectiveness Resource Allocation >Economic evaluation for first-line anti-hypertensive medicines: applications for the Philippines
【24h】

Economic evaluation for first-line anti-hypertensive medicines: applications for the Philippines

机译:一线抗高血压药物的经济评估:菲律宾的申请

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Medicines to control hypertension, a leading cause of morbidity and mortality, are a major component of health expenditures in the Philippines. This study aims to review economic studies for first line anti-hypertensive medical treatment without co-morbidities; and discuss practical, informational and policy implications on the use of economic evaluation in the Philippines. Methods A systematic literature review was performed using the following databases: MEDLINE , EMBASE, BIOSIS, PubMed, The Cochrane Library , Health Economics Evaluations Database (HEED) and the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination – NHS NICE. Six existing economic analytical frameworks were reviewed and one framework for critical appraisal was developed. Results Out of 1336 searched articles, 12 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The studies were summarized according to their background characteristics (year, journal, intervention and comparators, objective/study question, target audience, economic study type, study population, setting and country and source of funding/conflict of interest) and technical characteristics (perspective, time horizon, methodology/modeling, search strategy for parameters, costs, effectiveness measures, discounting, assumptions and biases, results, cost-effectiveness ratio, endpoints, sensitivity analysis, generalizability, strengths and limitations, conclusions, implications and feasibility and recommendations). The studies represented different countries, perspectives and stakeholders. Conclusions Diuretics were the most cost-effective drug class for first-line treatment of hypertension without co-morbidities. Although the Philippine Health Insurance Corporation may apply the recommendations given in previous studies (i.e. to subsidize diuretics, ACE inhibitors and calcium channel blockers), it is uncertain how much public funding is justified. There is an information gap on clinical data (transition probabilities, relative risks and risk reduction) and utility values on hypertension and related diseases from middle- and low- income countries. Considering the national relevance of the disease, a study on the costs of hypertension in the Philippines including in-patient, out-patient, out-of-pocket, local government and national government expenditure must be made. Economic evaluation may be incorporated in health technology assessment, planning, proposal development, research, prioritization and evaluation of health programmes. The approaches will vary depending on the policy questions. The information gap calls for building strong economic evaluative capacity in growing economies.
机译:背景技术控制高血压(发病率和死亡率的主要原因)的药物是菲律宾卫生支出的主要组成部分。这项研究的目的是回顾有关没有合并症的一线抗高血压药物治疗的经济学研究。讨论在菲律宾使用经济评估的实际,信息和政策影响。方法使用以下数据库进行系统的文献综述:MEDLINE,EMBASE,BIOSIS,PubMed,Cochrane图书馆,卫生经济学评估数据库(HEED)以及评论与传播中心– NHS NICE。审查了六个现有的经济分析框架,并开发了一个关键评估框架。结果搜索到的1336篇文章中,有12篇符合纳入标准。根据研究的背景特征(年份,期刊,干预和比较者,目标/研究问题,目标受众,经济研究类型,研究人群,背景和资金来源/利益冲突的国家和来源)以及技术特征(观点)对研究进行了总结,时间范围,方法/模型,参数,成本,有效性度量,折现,假设和偏差,结果,成本效益比,终点,敏感性分析,可概括性,优势和局限性,结论,影响和可行性以及建议的搜索策略) 。这些研究代表了不同的国家,观点和利益相关者。结论利尿剂是一线治疗高血压且无合并症的最具成本效益的药物。尽管菲律宾健康保险公司可能会采用先前研究中给出的建议(即为利尿剂,ACEI抑制剂和钙通道阻滞剂提供补贴),但尚不确定有多少公共资金是合理的。来自中低收入国家的有关高血压和相关疾病的临床数据(转换概率,相对风险和风险降低)和实用价值存在信息鸿沟。考虑到该疾病的国家相关性,必须对菲律宾的高血压成本进行研究,包括住院,门诊,自付费用,地方政府和国家政府的支出。经济评估可纳入卫生技术评估,规划,提案制定,研究,卫生计划的优先次序和评估。方法将根据政策问题而有所不同。信息鸿沟要求在成长中的经济体中建立强大的经济评估能力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号