首页> 外文期刊>Cost Effectiveness Resource Allocation >To what extent does recurrent government health expenditure in Uganda reflect its policy priorities?
【24h】

To what extent does recurrent government health expenditure in Uganda reflect its policy priorities?

机译:乌干达政府经常性卫生支出在多大程度上反映了其政策重点?

获取原文
           

摘要

Background The National Health Policy 2000 - 2009 and Health sector strategic plans I & II emphasized that Primary Health Care (PHC) would be the main strategy for national development and would be operationalized through provision of the minimum health care package. Commitment was to spend an increasing proportion of the health budget for the provision of the basic minimum package of health services which was interpreted to mean increasing spending at health centre level. This analysis was undertaken to gain a better understanding of changes in the way recurrent funding is allocated in the health sector in Uganda and to what extent it has been in line with agreed policy priorities. Methods Government recurrent wage and non-wage expenditures - based on annual releases by the Uganda Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development were compiled for the period 1997/1998 to financial year 2007/2008. Additional data was obtained from a series of Ministry of Health annual health sector reports as well as other reports. Data was verified by key government officials in Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development and Ministry of Health. Analysis of expenditures was done at sector level, by the different levels in the health care system and the different levels of care. Results There was a pronounced increase in the amount of funds released for recurrent expenditure over the review period fueled mainly by increases in the wage component. PHC services showed the greatest increase, increasing more than 70 times in ten years. At hospital level, expenditures remained fairly constant for the last 10 years with a slight reduction in the wage component. Conclusion The policy aspiration of increasing spending on PHC was attained but key aspects that would facilitate its realization were not addressed. At any given level of funding for the health sector, there is need to work out an optimal balance in investment in the different inputs to ensure efficiency in health spending. Equally important is the balance in investment between hospitals and health centers. There is a need to look comprehensively at what it takes to provide PHC services and invest accordingly.
机译:背景信息2000-2009年国家卫生政策以及卫生部门的战略计划I和II强调,初级卫生保健(PHC)将是国家发展的主要战略,并将通过提供最低限度的卫生保健一揽子计划来实施。承诺要花费更多的卫生预算资金用于提供基本的最低限度的一揽子医疗服务,这被解释为意味着要在卫生中心一级增加支出。进行该分析的目的是为了更好地了解乌干达卫生部门的经常性资金分配方式的变化,以及在多大程度上符合商定的政策重点。方法政府经常性工资和非工资性支出-根据乌干达财政,计划和经济发展部的年度数据,编制了1997/1998年至2007/2008财政年度的数据。从卫生部一系列年度卫生部门报告以及其他报告中获得了更多数据。数据已由财政,计划和经济发展部和卫生部的主要政府官员核实。支出分析是按部门级别,卫生保健系统的不同级别和不同的护理级别进行的。结果在回顾期内,用于经常性支出的资金明显增加,主要原因是工资部分的增加。 PHC服务增长最快,十年内增长了70倍以上。在医院一级,过去十年的支出保持相当稳定,工资部分略有减少。结论实现了增加初级保健费用的政策愿望,但没有解决有助于实现初级保健的关键方面。在为卫生部门提供任何给定水平的资金的情况下,都需要在不同投入上确定最佳投资平衡,以确保卫生支出的效率。同样重要的是医院与卫生中心之间的投资平衡。有必要全面了解提供PHC服务并进行相应投资所需的费用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号