...
首页> 外文期刊>Advanced Pharmaceutical Bulletin >Niosomal Benzoyl Peroxide and Clindamycin Lotion Versus NiosomalClindamycin Lotion in Treatment of Acne Vulgaris: A RandomizedClinical Trial
【24h】

Niosomal Benzoyl Peroxide and Clindamycin Lotion Versus NiosomalClindamycin Lotion in Treatment of Acne Vulgaris: A RandomizedClinical Trial

机译:Niosomal过氧化苯甲酰和Clindamycin乳液与NiosomalClindamycin乳液治疗寻常型痤疮的随机临床试验

获取原文
           

摘要

Purpose: Combination of benzoyl peroxide (BPO) with topical antibiotics can lead to higherefficacy and less bacterial resistance, but it in turn increases adverse effects such as skinirritability and dryness. In this study, the efficacy of combination therapy of niosomal BPO 1%and clindamycin (CL) 1% is compared with niosomal CL in acne vulgaris.Methods: This is a double-blind clinical trial study on 100 patients with acne vulgaris inAfzalipour hospital in Kerman. Patients were randomly divided into 2 groups (case and control).The case group received niosomal combination of BPO 1% and CL 1%.The control groupreceived niosomal CL1%. The efficacy of treatment protocols was evaluated in 2nd, 4th, 8thand 12th weeks of treatment by counting lesions (severity and grading acne lesions) and qualityof life (QoL). Furthermore, side effect were evaluated at each treatment visits.Results: The reduction in mean percentage of acne lesions in case group (treated with BPO 1%and CL1%) (64.21%) was higher than control group (treated with niosomal CL 1%) (59.04%),but the statistical difference was not significant. Sum of excellent and good results were foundin 80% and 76.1% of case and control groups, respectively (P = 0.377). Also adding BPO to thetreatment formulation in case group did not increase adverse effects, as statistical differencebetween 2 groups was not significant.Conclusion: Combination of niosomal BPO 1% and CL 1% in treatment of acne vulgaris showedhigher efficacy with no increase in adverse effects in comparison with niosomal CL 1%, but thestatistical difference was not significant.
机译:目的:过氧化苯甲酰(BPO)与局部抗生素的组合可导致更高的功效和更低的细菌抵抗力,但反过来又增加了诸如皮肤过敏性和干燥感的不利影响。本研究将1%的BPO和1%的克林霉素(CL)联合治疗与普通的CL治疗寻常痤疮的疗效进行了比较。方法:这是一项对100例寻常痤疮患者进行双盲临床试验研究。克尔曼。将患者随机分为2组(病例组和对照组),病例组接受BPO 1%和CL 1%的血浆组联合治疗,对照组接受CL1%的血浆组。在治疗的第二,第四,第八和第十二周,通过计算病变(严重程度和粉刺病变)和生活质量(QoL)来评估治疗方案的有效性。结果:病例组(用BPO 1%和CL1%治疗)痤疮病变的平均百分比降低(64.21%)高于对照组(用碘化CL 1%治疗) )(59.04%),但统计差异不显着。在病例组和对照组中,分别有80%和76.1%的人获得了优异和良好的结果总和(P = 0.377)。病例组在治疗配方中也添加了BPO并没有增加不良反应,因为两组之间的统计学差异不显着。结论:普通BPO 1%和CL 1%的组合治疗寻常型痤疮显示出较高的疗效,但未增加不良反应。与基因型CL 1%比较,但统计学差异不显着。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号