首页> 外文期刊>Acta Radiologica Open >Non-contrast-enhanced MR portography and hepatic venography with time-spatial labeling inversion pulses: comparison at 1.5 Tesla and 3 Tesla
【24h】

Non-contrast-enhanced MR portography and hepatic venography with time-spatial labeling inversion pulses: comparison at 1.5 Tesla and 3 Tesla

机译:无时空标记反转脉冲的非增强MR眼底造影和肝静脉造影:在1.5 Tesla和3 Tesla下的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

A 3 Tesla (3?T) magnetic resonance (MR) scanner is a promising tool for upper abdominal MR angiography. However, there is no report focused on the image quality of non-contrast-enhanced MR portography and hepatic venography at 3?T. To compare and evaluate images of non-contrast-enhanced MR portography and hepatic venography with time-spatial labeling inversion pulses (Time-SLIP) at 1.5 Tesla (1.5?T) and 3?T. Twenty-five healthy volunteers were examined using respiratory-triggered three-dimensional balanced steady-state free-precession (bSSFP) with Time-SLIP. For portography, we used one tagging pulse (selective inversion recovery) and one non-selective inversion recovery pulse; for venography, two tagging pulses were used. The relative signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were quantified, and the quality of visualization was evaluated. The CNRs of the main portal vein, right portal vein, and left portal vein at 3?T were better than at 1.5?T. The image quality scores for the portal branches of segment 4, 5, and 8 were significantly higher at 3?T than at 1.5?T. The CNR of the right hepatic vein (RHV) at 3?T was significantly lower than at 1.5?T. The image quality scores of RHV and the middle hepatic vein were higher at 1.5?T than at 3?T. For RHV visualization, the difference was statistically significant. Non-contrast-enhanced MR portography with Time-SLIP at 3?T significantly improved visualization of the peripheral branch in healthy volunteers compared with1.5?T. Non-contrast-enhanced MR hepatic venography at 1.5?T was better than at 3?T.
机译:3特斯拉(3?T)磁共振(MR)扫描仪是上腹部MR血管造影的有前途的工具。但是,目前尚无关于3?T MR造影和肝静脉造影的图像质量的报道。比较和评估1.5特斯拉(1.5?T)和3?T下具有时空标记反转脉冲(Time-SLIP)的非造影剂MR门静脉造影和肝静脉造影的图像。使用Time-SLIP,使用呼吸触发的三维平衡稳态自由进动(bSSFP)对25名健康志愿者进行了检查。对于门户,我们使用了一个标记脉冲(选择性反转恢复脉冲)和一个非选择性反转恢复脉冲。对于静脉造影,使用了两个标记脉冲。对相对信噪比(SNR)和对比噪声比(CNR)进行量化,并评估可视化的质量。 3?T时主门静脉,右门静脉和左门静脉的CNR优于1.5?T。第4、5和8段门静脉分支的图像质量得分在3?T时明显高于1.5?T。右肝静脉(RHV)在3?T时的CNR明显低于1.5?T。 RHV和肝中静脉的图像质量评分在1.5?T时高于3?T。对于RHV可视化,差异具有统计学意义。与1.5?T相比,在3?T时使用Time-SLIP进行的非增强MR门诊显着改善了健康志愿者外周分支的可视化。 1.5?T的非对比增强MR肝静脉造影优于3?T。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号