...
首页> 外文期刊>Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis >Benefit Sharing Schema from the Forest: Identifying Potential Distributions to Customary Communities in Teluk Bintuni District, Indonesia
【24h】

Benefit Sharing Schema from the Forest: Identifying Potential Distributions to Customary Communities in Teluk Bintuni District, Indonesia

机译:森林中的利益共享方案:确定印度尼西亚直落民都区的习惯社区的潜在分布

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This study identifies the benefits that traditional communities receive from the tropical rain forest in New Guinea, Indonesia. In this study, various benefit sharing schema developed by forest concession holder are assessed to understand the precise outcome compared to traditional welfare solutions. It further aims to identify benefit sharing schemas applied by concession investors in the forest sector and assesses these schema based on equitable principles. A questionnaire and semi?structured interviews were used to collect data from traditional communities, concession holders, and the government. Interviews and field observations were randomly conducted and then analyzed for both quantitative and qualitative descriptions. The results indicate that there were five benefits sharing schemas i.e., those based on financial schema, based on the market, based on infrastructure, based on social management, and based on the transfer of knowledge and technology. Overall, all the schemas that were developed did not fulfil the same criteria. However, there were only two schemas that were considered to be equal and efficient: the financial based?schema and infrastructure based?schema. This is indicated by the larger number of criteria and requirements that they fulfil. Yet, all the schemas still present various conflicts either between customary communities and the government or between the communities and investors.
机译:这项研究确定了传统社区从印度尼西亚新几内亚的热带雨林中获得的收益。在这项研究中,评估了森林特许权持有人开发的各种利益共享方案,以了解与传统福利解决方案相比的确切结果。它还旨在确定森林部门的特许权投资者采用的利益共享方案,并根据公平原则评估这些方案。问卷和半结构式访谈被用来收集传统社区,特许权持有人和政府的数据。随机进行访谈和实地观察,然后进行定量和定性分析。结果表明,共有五种利益共享模式,即基于金融模式,基于市场,基于基础设施,基于社会管理以及基于知识和技术转让的利益共享模式。总体而言,所有开发的架构都不符合相同的标准。但是,只有两种模式被认为是平等和有效的:基于财务的模式和基于基础架构的模式。这由它们满足的大量标准和要求表明。但是,所有模式仍然在习惯社区与政府之间或在社区与投资者之间存在各种冲突。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号