...
首页> 外文期刊>Acta Radiologica Open >Intra- and inter-observer agreement and reliability of bone mineral density measurements around acetabular cup: a porcine ex-vivo study using single- and dual-energy computed tomography:
【24h】

Intra- and inter-observer agreement and reliability of bone mineral density measurements around acetabular cup: a porcine ex-vivo study using single- and dual-energy computed tomography:

机译:髋臼杯周围观察者之间和观察者之间的一致性以及骨密度测量的可靠性:一项使用单能和双能计算机断层扫描的猪离体研究:

获取原文

摘要

Periprosthetic bone loss is considered to be a potentially contributing factor in aseptic loosening of acetabular hip components, but no studies have shown this association. The lack of association might be caused by insufficient image quality because of metal artifacts and challenges in measuring bone density (BMD) in complex anatomic structures which might be overcome using dual-energy computed tomography (DECT). To test inter- and intra-observer agreement and reliability of in-house segmentation software measuring BMD adjacent to acetabular cup and to compare measurements performed with single-energy CT (SECT) and DECT in cemented and cementless cups. Twenty-four acetabular cups inserted in porcine hip specimens were scanned with SECT and DECT. Bone density was measured in a three-dimensional volume adjacent to the cup. Double measurements were performed. BMD derived from SECT was approximately four times higher than that of DECT. In both scan modes, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.90 with no differences between repeated measurements, except for uncemented cups where a statistically significant difference of 11?mg/cm3 was found with DECT. DECT showed narrower limits of agreement than SECT. Inter-observer analysis showed small differences. BMD can be estimated with high intra- and inter-observer reliability with SECT and DECT around acetabular cups using custom software. The intra- and inter-observer agreement of DECT is superior to that of SECT and better in the cementless concept. Good intra- and inter-observer reliability can be obtained in both cemented and cementless cups using the segmentation software. SECT and DECT cannot be used interchangeably.
机译:假体周围骨质丢失被认为是髋臼髋关节组件无菌性松动的潜在因素,但尚无研究表明这种关联。缺乏关联可能是由于金属伪影以及在复杂解剖结构中测量骨密度(BMD)方面的挑战而导致的图像质量不足所致,而使用双能计算机断层扫描(DECT)可以克服这些挑战。为了测试观察者之间和观察者之间的一致性以及内部分段软件在髋臼杯附近测量BMD的可靠性,并比较用单能CT(SECT)和DECT在骨水泥杯和非骨水泥杯中进行的测量。用SECT和DECT扫描在猪臀部标本中插入的二十四个髋臼杯。在靠近杯子的三维空间中测量骨密度。进行了两次测量。来自SECT的BMD大约是DECT的四倍。在两种扫描模式下,组内相关系数(ICC)均> 0.90,两次重复测量之间无差异,但无胶杯中DECT的统计学差异为11?mg / cm3。与SECT相比,DECT的协议限制范围更窄。观察者间分析显示出很小的差异。使用定制软件,可以通过髋臼杯周围的SECT和DECT以较高的观察者间和观察者间可靠性评估BMD。 DECT在观察者内部和观察者之间的协议优于SECT,并且在非固定概念中更好。使用分割软件,可以在胶结杯和非胶结杯中获得良好的观察者间和观察者间可靠性。 SECT和DECT不能互换使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号