...
首页> 外文期刊>Acta orthopaedica. >Are distal radius fractures due to fragility or to falls?: A consecutive case-control study of bone mineral density, tendency to fall, risk factors for osteoporosis, and health-related quality of life
【24h】

Are distal radius fractures due to fragility or to falls?: A consecutive case-control study of bone mineral density, tendency to fall, risk factors for osteoporosis, and health-related quality of life

机译:distal骨远端骨折是由于脆性还是由于跌倒引起的?:一项连续的病例对照研究,涉及骨矿物质密度,跌倒趋势,骨质疏松症的危险因素以及与健康相关的生活质量

获取原文
           

摘要

Background ?A fracture of the distal radius is considered to indicate an increased risk of future fractures, especially a hip fracture. The main causes may be osteoporosis or a tendency to fall, separately or in combination. Methods ?93 women and 5 men with a recent radius fracture and the same number of controls were measured with a heel-DXL and asked to complete one questionnaire on their quality of life (SF-36), and one on risk factors. Results ?The mean T-score of the patients was –2.1, and for the controls it was –1.9 (p = 0.3). The patients aged over 64 years had a history of falling more often than the corresponding controls (p = 0.01), but there was no difference in T-score. By contrast, patients 45-64 years of age showed a non-significant, lower T-score (p = 0.09), but there was no difference concerning their history of falling. For all other risk factors, no differences were found between the patients and the controls. There were significant differences between the patients and the controls in some of the functions in the SF-36, due to the radius fracture. Interpretation ?This study indicates that the underlying cause of a distal radius fracture may be different in patients aged 45–64 years and those who are more than 64 years old.
机译:背景?骨远端骨折被认为表明未来骨折,尤其是髋部骨折的风险增加。主要原因可能是骨质疏松症或跌倒的趋势,可以单独或组合使用。方法用足跟DXL对93例最近radius骨骨折的男性和5例男性和相同的对照组进行了测量,并要求他们填写一份关于其生活质量的问卷(SF-36),以及一份关于危险因素的问卷。结果?患者的平均T评分为–2.1,而对照组为–1.9(p = 0.3)。 64岁以上患者的跌倒史比相应的对照组要多(p = 0.01),但T评分无差异。相比之下,年龄在45-64岁之间的患者的T分数无统计学意义(p = 0.09),但跌倒史无差异。对于所有其他危险因素,患者与对照组之间没有发现差异。由于the骨骨折,患者和对照组在SF-36的某些功能上存在显着差异。解释?这项研究表明,radius骨远端骨折的根本原因可能在45-64岁的患者和64岁以上的患者中有所不同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号