首页> 外文期刊>Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica >Comparison of repair techniques in small and medium-sized rotator cuff tears in cadaveric sheep shoulders
【24h】

Comparison of repair techniques in small and medium-sized rotator cuff tears in cadaveric sheep shoulders

机译:尸羊肩部中小型肩袖撕裂修复技术的比较

获取原文
       

摘要

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare new knotless single-row and double-row suture anchor techniques with traditional transosseous suture techniques for different sized rotator cuff tears in an animal model. Methods: The study included 56 cadaveric sheep shoulders. Supraspinatus cuff tears of 1 cm repaired with new knotless single-row suture anchor technique and supraspinatus and infraspinatus rotator cuff tears of 3 cm repaired with double-row suture anchor technique were compared to traditional transosseous suture techniques and control groups. The repaired tendons were loaded with 5 mm/min static velocity with 2.5 kgN load cell in Instron 8874 machine until the repair failure. Results: The 1 cm transosseous group was statistically superior to 1 cm control group (p=0.021, p<0.05) and the 3 cm SpeedBridge group was statistically superior to the 1 cm SpeedFix group (p=0.012, p<0.05). The differences between the other groups were not statistically significant. Conclusion: No significant difference was found between the new knotless suture anchor techniques and traditional transosseous suture techniques
机译:目的:本研究的目的是针对动物模型中不同大小的肩袖撕裂,将新的无结单排和双排缝合锚固技术与传统的跨骨缝合技术进行比较。方法:研究包括56只尸体绵羊的肩膀。将新的无结单行缝合锚定技术修复的1 cm上pr上肌袖口撕裂和双行缝合锚定技术修复的3 cm上pin上肌和鼻下肌肌腱旋转袖口撕裂与传统的经骨缝合技术和对照组进行比较。在Instron 8874机器中,用2.5 kgN称重传感器以5 mm / min的静态速度加载修复后的肌腱,直至修复失败。结果:1 cm骨膜组在统计学上优于1 cm对照组(p = 0.021,p <0.05),而3 cm SpeedBridge组在统计学上优于1 cm SpeedFix组(p = 0.012,p <0.05)。其他组之间的差异无统计学意义。结论:新的无结缝合锚固技术与传统的穿骨缝合技术之间无显着差异

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号