首页> 外文期刊>Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica >Comparison of different electrotherapy methods and exercise therapy in shoulder impingement syndrome: A prospective randomized controlled trial
【24h】

Comparison of different electrotherapy methods and exercise therapy in shoulder impingement syndrome: A prospective randomized controlled trial

机译:肩部撞击综合征不同电疗法和运动疗法的比较:一项前瞻性随机对照试验

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective The aim of this study was to assess and compare the effects of different electrotherapy methods and exercise therapy on pain, function and quality of life in shoulder impingement syndrome. Methods Eighty-three patients (66 females, 17 males; mean age: 48.2?±?7.33 years) with shoulder impingement syndrome were selected and 79 of them were randomly allocated into four groups. Group 1 (n?=?19, mean age: 47.89?±?7.12 years) was given hot pack and exercises, Group 2 (n?=?20, mean age: 47.70?±?6.51 years) was given hot packs, exercises and interferential current, Group 3 (n?=?20, mean age: 48.50?±?8.34 years) was given hot packs, exercises and TENS and Group 4 (n?=?20, mean age: 48.55?±?7.89 years) was given hot packs, exercises and ultrasound three times a week for four weeks. Assessments were made before treatment, right after it and three months after that using the visual analog scale (VAS), Short Form-36 (SF-36) and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) outcome measures. Results At the fourth week and third month assessments, all groups showed significant improvements in terms of pain, DASH and SF-36 physical component scores (p? 0.05). Conclusion Application of ultrasound, interferential current and TENS in addition to exercise therapy in shoulder impingement syndrome treatment had similar improvements in terms of pain, function and physical component of quality of life. However, interferential current treatment showed significantly better outcomes for the mental component of quality of life. Level of evidence Level I, Therapeutic study.
机译:目的本研究旨在评估和比较不同的电疗方法和运动疗法对肩部撞击综合征的疼痛,功能和生活质量的影响。方法选择83例肩部撞击综合征患者,其中女性66例,男性17例;平均年龄:48.2±7.33岁,将其中的79例随机分为四组。第1组(n?=?19,平均年龄:47.89?±?7.12岁)被给予热敷和锻炼;第二组(n?=?20,平均年龄:47.70?±?6.51岁)被给予热敷,锻炼和干扰电流,给第3组(n = 20),平均年龄:48.50±8.34岁)进行热敷,锻炼和TENS和第4组(n = 20,平均年龄:48.55±7.89)。年),每周进行三次热敷,锻炼和超声检查,持续四个星期。在治疗前,治疗后和治疗后三个月使用视觉模拟量表(VAS),36型简表(SF-36)和手臂,肩膀和手部残疾(DASH)结果指标进行评估。结果在第4周和第3个月的评估中,所有组在疼痛,DASH和SF-36物理成分评分方面均表现出显着改善(p?0.05)。结论超声,干扰电流和TENS以及运动疗法在肩部撞击综合征治疗中的应用在疼痛,功能和生活质量的身体组成方面有类似的改善。然而,干扰电流治疗对生活质量的心理组成显示出明显更好的结果。证据级别I级,治疗研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号