...
首页> 外文期刊>Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica >Is volar locking plate superior to external fixation for distal radius fractures? A comprehensive meta-analysis
【24h】

Is volar locking plate superior to external fixation for distal radius fractures? A comprehensive meta-analysis

机译:对于远侧radius骨骨折,手掌锁定板是否优于外固定?全面的荟萃分析

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objective The aim of this meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCT) and retrospective cohort studies (CS) regarding the use of volar locking plate (VLP) and external fixation (EF) in distal radius fractures was to determine whether there was any evidence that one treatment was superior to the other. Methods The meta-analysis followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Electrical databases (PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane library) were retrieved to find RCTs and CSs met the eligibility criteria. Two reviewers screened the studies, extracted the data and evaluated the methodological quality, and performed data analysis with RevMan 5.1. The publication bias was test by Stata 14.0. The Begg's and Egger's test were performed by Stata 14.0. The quality of evidence was graded according to the criteria of GRADE. We ultimately included ten RCTs and eleven CSs. Results A total of 1590 subjects were reported. Publication bias was detected by funnel plot in RCTs. VLP could provide better results such as DASH scores (RCT: MD?=?-6.12, 95%CI?=?-12.07–0.17; CS: MD?=?-6.43, 95%CI?=?-12.53–0.3), ulnar variance (RCT: MD?=?-0.81, 95%CI?=?-1.25–0.37) and infection rate (RCT: RR?=?0.25, 95%CI?=?0.10–0.65; CS: RR?=?0.15, 95%CI?=?0.06–0.40). There were no significant differences for G-W scores, VAS and grip strength between the VLP group and EF group. There was significantly greater loss of volar tilt (P?=?0.01) and radial inclination (P?=?0.02) in patients receiving EF, basing on the CSs. Conclusions VLP could provide better results, such as DASH scores, ulnar variance, volar tilt, radial inclination and infection rate. The use of VLP appear to be associated with better results of ROM (flexion, pronation, supination and radial deviation), radiographic parameters (volar tilt and radial inclination) and lower total complication rate and CRPS rate in CSs. Level of evidence Level 1, Therapeutic study.
机译:目的这项关于在distal骨远端骨折中使用掌侧锁定钢板(VLP)和外固定架(EF)的随机对照试验(RCT)和回顾性队列研究(CS)的荟萃分析的目的是确定是否有任何证据一种治疗优于另一种。方法荟萃分析遵循系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南。检索电气数据库(PubMed,EMBASE和Cochrane库)以找到符合资格标准的RCT和CS。两名审阅者筛选了研究,提取了数据并评估了方法学质量,并使用RevMan 5.1进行了数据分析。出版偏差由Stata 14.0测试。 Begg和Egger的测试由Stata 14.0执行。证据的质量根据GRADE的标准分级。我们最终包括了10个RCT和11个CS。结果共报告1590名受试者。通过RCT中的漏斗图检测到出版偏倚。 VLP可以提供更好的结果,例如DASH得分(RCT:MD ==-6.12,95%CI ==-12.07-0.17; CS:MD ==-6.43,95%CI ==-12.53-0.3) ,尺骨方差(RCT:MD ==-0.81、95%CI ==-1.25-0.37)和感染率(RCT:RR == 0.25、95%CI == 0.10-0.65; CS:RR? =?0.15,95%CI?=?0.06-0.40)。 VLP组和EF组之间的G-W评分,VAS和握力没有显着差异。根据CSs,接受EF的患者的掌侧倾角(P <= 0.01)和radial骨倾角(P = 0.02)的损失明显更大。结论VLP可以提供更好的结果,例如DASH评分,尺骨方差,掌侧倾,radial骨倾角和感染率。 VLP的使用似乎与ROM更好的结果(屈曲,内旋,旋后和径向偏斜),X线照相参数(眼窝倾斜和径向倾斜)以及CS的总并发症发生率和CRPS率较低有关。证据级别级别1,治疗研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号