...
首页> 外文期刊>Acta Cirurgica Brasileira >Comparative study of pain in women submitted to conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy 1
【24h】

Comparative study of pain in women submitted to conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy 1

机译:常规腹腔镜胆囊切除术与单端口腹腔镜胆囊切除术的女性疼痛比较研究1

获取原文

摘要

Purpose: To evaluate postoperative pain in patients submitted to conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy with four ports versus single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy with only one port. Methods: Twenty-one patients were included in the conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy group and 19 other patients in the single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy group. A VAS was used for the assessment of postoperative pain at three time points. Differences were considered statistically significant when p<0.05. Results: Intergroup analysis showed no significant difference in VAS scores between the conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy and single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy groups at any of the time points studied. Conclusion: This study found no significant difference in postoperative pain between the two groups.
机译:目的:评估接受四孔常规腹腔镜胆囊切除术与仅一个孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者的术后疼痛。方法:常规腹腔镜胆囊切除术组包括21例患者,单端口腹腔镜胆囊切除术组包括19例。在三个时间点使用VAS评估术后疼痛。当p <0.05时,差异被认为是统计学显着的。结果:组间分析显示,在研究的任何时间点,常规腹腔镜胆囊切除术组和单端口腹腔镜胆囊切除术组之间的VAS评分均无显着差异。结论:本研究发现两组术后疼痛无显着差异。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号