...
首页> 外文期刊>Acta bio-medica: Atenei Parmensis >The requirements for manufacturing highly active or sensitising drugs comparing Good Manufacturing Practices
【24h】

The requirements for manufacturing highly active or sensitising drugs comparing Good Manufacturing Practices

机译:比较良好生产规范的生产高活性或敏化药物的要求

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: To date there exist no internationally recognised Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) that clearly outline universally accepted standards for manufacturing highly active or sensitising ingredients. The pharmaceutical industry is faced with a twofold problem: determining which drugs need dedicated production?areas and identifying the different regulations required in different countries. The aim of this paper is to find, by comparing the current regulations of the various Regulatory Agencies, the differences between containment requirements for the production of highly active or sensitising ingredients. Methods: An analysis of the following Regulatory Agencies’ GMPs was performed: Europe (EMA), China (CFDA), Mexico (COFEPRIS), United States (FDA), Canada (Health Canada) Brazil (ANVISA), India (CDSCO), PIC/S and WHO in order to examine the differences in terms of containment requirements set by the different Regulatory Authorities for the manufacture of highly active or sensitising ingredients. Results: Our analysis found that the majority of Regulatory Agencies require that beta-lactams (sensitising materials) be produced in dedicated and segregated facilities. For “certain” highly active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), COFEPRIS, FDA, HC, EMA, PIC/S and WHO require that they be produced in facilities similar to those required for beta-lactams, while CDSCO, CFDA and ANVISA require that production takes place in segregated areas. Further differences between the Agencies have emerged regarding classes of highly APIs that require dedicated production. Conclusion: A study of GMP adopted by Regulatory Agencies has uncovered significant differences, in particular concerning containment requirements for the production of APIs. For this reason, the harmonisation of GMP following up-to-date quality standards based on cutting-edge science which are globally applicable is fundamental and will benefit companies and patients alike. Pharmaceutical companies would not be obliged to follow requirements enforced by the State in which they intend to manufacture a product, and patients would benefit from high-quality drugs regardless of their place of production.
机译:背景:迄今为止,还没有国际公认的良好生产规范(GMP)清楚地概述了生产高活性或敏化成分的通用标准。制药行业面临双重问题:确定哪些药品需要专门的生产区域,并确定不同国家/地区需要的不同法规。本文的目的是通过比较各个监管机构的现行法规,找出生产高活性或敏化成分的容器要求之间的差异。方法:对以下监管机构的GMP进行了分析:欧洲(EMA),中国(CFDA),墨西哥(COFEPRIS),美国(FDA),加拿大(加拿大卫生部)巴西(ANVISA),印度(CDSCO), PIC / S和WHO旨在检查不同监管机构在生产高活性或敏化成分方面对收容要求的不同。结果:我们的分析发现,大多数监管机构都要求在专用且隔离的设施中生产β-内酰胺(敏化材料)。对于“某些”高活性药物成分(API),COFEPRIS,FDA,HC,EMA,PIC / S和WHO要求在与β-内酰胺类药物类似的设施中生产,而CDSCO,CFDA和ANVISA则要求生产发生在隔离区域。在需要专门生产的高度API类别之间,代理商之间出现了进一步的差异。结论:监管机构通过的GMP研究发现了显着差异,特别是在API生产的密封要求方面。因此,遵循基于全球适用的尖端科学的最新质量标准来协调GMP是至关重要的,这将使公司和患者受益。制药公司没有义务遵守其打算生产产品的州所执行的要求,并且患者无论其生产地在哪里都将从高质量药物中受益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号