...
首页> 外文期刊>Crop science >Combining Ability Estimation for Grain Yield of Maize Exotic Germplasm Using Testers from Three Heterotic Groups
【24h】

Combining Ability Estimation for Grain Yield of Maize Exotic Germplasm Using Testers from Three Heterotic Groups

机译:使用三个杂种优势群体的测试仪估算玉米外来种质的产量

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Combining ability estimates of lines to be used in breeding are useful for maize (Zea mays L.) breeders. The objectives of this study were to (i) evaluate combining ability of 25 improved exotic germplasm using different numbers of testers (1 to 3) from Suwan1, Reid, and non-Reid heterotic groups; (ii) study differences in combining ability estimates obtained with different number of testers from the same vs. different heterotic groups; and (iii) determine the appropriate segregating (a€?Sa€?) generation in which line selection should be done to obtain stable general combining ability (GCA) estimates of lines. The results showed that three testers (one from each of the three heterotic groups) were economically best for estimating GCA effects of lines, and if a tester from one of the three heterotic groups was missed, GCA estimates for some lines were biased when compared with GCA estimates with testers from all three heterotic groups. Second, the specific combining ability (SCA) effects of test-crosses were quite similar regardless of whether one or two testers were used from each of the three heterotic groups. Thus, to obtain reliable SCA estimates, at least one tester would need to be used from each of the heterotic groups. Third, the SCA effects were different among crosses between different lines and testers, and to obtain stable estimates of GCA effects for a line, S4 or S5 generation should be the earliest generation in which to begin selection. However, to select lines with diverse genetic backgrounds, S3 should be the key generation for selection.
机译:用于育种的品系的结合能力估计对于玉米(Zea mays L.)育种者是有用的。这项研究的目的是:(i)使用来自Suwan1,Reid和非Reid杂种群体的不同数量的测试人员(1-3人)评估25种改良的外来种质的结合能力; (ii)研究在相同或不同异质群体中使用不同数量的测试人员获得的结合能力估计的差异; (iii)确定应进行选线的适当隔离(a?Sa?)世代,以获得稳定的线的一般组合能力(GCA)估计。结果表明,三位测试者(三个杂种组中的每一个)在经济上是最好的,以估计品系的GCA效果,如果错过了这三个杂种群体之一的测试者,则某些品系的GCA估计与GCA估计了来自所有三个杂种组的测试人员。其次,测试交叉的特异性结合能力(SCA)效果非常相似,无论三个杂合基团中的每一个是否使用一个或两个测试仪。因此,为了获得可靠的SCA估计,需要从每个杂原子组中至少使用一个测试器。第三,不同品系和测试者之间的杂交对SCA的影响是不同的,为了获得稳定的GCA品系估计值,S4或S5代应该是开始选择的最早代。但是,要选择具有不同遗传背景的品系,S3应该是选择的关键代。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号