首页> 外文期刊>Current urology. >Diagnostic Accuracy of a MR Protocol Acquired with and without Endorectal Coil for Detection of Prostate Cancer: A Multicenter Study
【24h】

Diagnostic Accuracy of a MR Protocol Acquired with and without Endorectal Coil for Detection of Prostate Cancer: A Multicenter Study

机译:带有或不带有直肠内线圈的MR协议对前列腺癌检测的诊断准确性:一项多中心研究

获取原文
       

摘要

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to compare diagnostic accuracy of a prostate multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) protocol for detection of prostate cancer between images acquired with and without en-dorectal coil (ERC). Materials: This study was approved by the regional ethics committee. Between 2014 and 2015, 33 patients (median age 51.3 years; range 42.1-77.3 years) who underwent prostate-MRI at 3T scanners at 2 different institutions, acquired with (mpMRIERC) and without (mpMRIPPA) ERC and who received radical prostatectomy, were included in this retrospective study. Two expert readers (R1, R2) attributed a PI-RADS version 2 score for the most suspect (i. e. index) lesion for mpMRIPPA and mpMRIERC. Sensitivity and positive predictive value for detection of index lesions were assessed using 2 × 2 contingency tables. Differences between groups were tested using the McNemar test. Whole-mount histopathology served as reference standard. Results: On a quadrant-basis cumulative sensitivity ranged between 0.61-0.67 and 0.76-0.88 for mpMRIPPA and mpMRIERC protocols, respectively (p 0.05). Cumulative positive predictive value ranged between 0.80-0.81 and 0.89-0.91 for mpMRIPPA and mpMRIERC protocols, respectively. The differences were not statistically significant for R1 (p = 0.267) or R2 (p = 0.508). Conclusion: Our results suggest that there may be no significant differences for detection of prostate cancer between images acquired with and without an ERC.
机译:简介:这项研究的目的是比较在使用和不使用直肠线圈(ERC)采集的图像之间进行前列腺多参数磁共振成像(mpMRI)协议检测前列腺癌的诊断准确性。材料:这项研究得到区域伦理委员会的批准。在2014年至2015年之间,有33例患者(中位年龄51.3岁;范围42.1-77.3岁)在2个不同机构的3T扫描仪上接受了前列腺MRI检查,分别接受(mpMRIERC)和不接受(mpMRIPPA)ERC并接受了彻底的前列腺切除术。包括在这项回顾性研究中。两名专业读者(R1,R2)将mpMRIPPA和mpMRIERC的最可疑(即索引)病变归为PI-RADS 2版评分。使用2×2列联表评估了检测指标病变的敏感性和阳性预测值。使用McNemar检验测试组之间的差异。整个组织病理学作为参考标准。结果:在一个象限的基础上,mpMRIPPA和mpMRIERC方案的累积灵敏度分别在0.61-0.67和0.76-0.88之间(p> 0.05)。 mpMRIPPA和mpMRIERC协议的累计阳性预测值分别在0.80-0.81和0.89-0.91之间。对于R1(p = 0.267)或R2(p = 0.508),差异无统计学意义。结论:我们的结果表明,在有和没有ERC的情况下,所采集图像之间的前列腺癌检测可能没有显着差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号