机译:四种防龋齿材料对永久性前磨牙牙齿的抗剪强度科学出版物
Problem statement: The purpose of this study was to compare the shear bond strength of four cariostatic restorative materials to dentin of permanent teeth. Approach: Restorative materials which have used in the study were composite P60 (3M), conventional glass ionomer (Fuji II, GC), light cured glass ionomer (Vitremer, 3M), compomer (F2000, 3M) and flow compoglass (Vivadent). This study was in vito study 4 groups of 10 teeth were used. Buccal surface of teeth was cut by high speed diamond cylinder burs, no 0.9 and dentin was exposed. Dentin surface was polished using
问题陈述: STRONG>这项研究的目的是比较四种防龋修复材料与恒牙牙本质的剪切粘结强度。 方法: STRONG>研究中使用的修复材料为复合材料P60(3M),常规玻璃离聚物(Fuji II,GC),光固化玻璃离聚物(Vitremer,3M),复合物(F2000,3M)和流动复合玻璃(Vivadent)。这项研究是体外研究,共使用4组10颗牙齿。牙齿的颊面被高速金刚石圆柱头锉刀切开,没有0.9,并且牙本质暴露。牙本质表面使用
机译:牙本质牙本质上使用抗菌清漆对牙齿有色修复材料的剪切粘合强度的影响。
机译:牙齿有色材料与原牙牙本质的微拉伸粘合强度。
机译:包括实验材料的齿涂材料的剪切粘结强度含有各种多离子释放填料及其对预防牙本质脱矿质的影响
机译:氩激光固化对牙本质剪切结合强度的影响
机译:两种不同的牙龈有色材料粘结到钛合金圆盘和丙烯酸人造牙上的剪切粘结强度的体外比较。
机译:根管填料和预处理对溶剂对初齿牙本质复合树脂剪切粘合强度的影响
机译:基于硅酸钙的修复材料和放射性后玻璃离子修复水泥在原发和恒牙中的剪切粘合强度和微渗漏的对比评价:体外研究