首页> 外文期刊>Current Journal of Applied Science and Technology >Comparative Effects of Structured and GuidedInquiry Instructional Techniques on Students’Academic Achievement in Basic Electricity in KwaraState Technical Colleges
【24h】

Comparative Effects of Structured and GuidedInquiry Instructional Techniques on Students’Academic Achievement in Basic Electricity in KwaraState Technical Colleges

机译:结构化和指导性研究教学技术对KwaraState技术学院基础电力学生的学术成就的比较效果

获取原文
       

摘要

The study was designed to determine the effects of Structured and Guided Inquiry Instructional Techniques on Technical College students’ academic achievement in Basic Electricity. Four research questions raised and 3 Null hypotheses guided the study. Quasi-experimental research design involving pre-test, Post-test, non-equivalent control group was used in this study. The population of the study was 233 Electrical/Electronics Vocational Year 2 students from Kwara State technical colleges. This consisted of 134 students as the subjects in the experimental group I and 99 students as the subjects in the experimental group II. The instrument used for data collection was Basic Electricity Academic Achievement Tests (BEAT). The instrument was subjected to face and content validity by two experts (Lecturers) in Industrial and Technology Education and one expert in Science Education, from Federal University of Technology Minna. Using Pearson’s Product Moment Correlation technique, a reliability coefficient of .88 was obtained. Mean was used to answer the research questions, while t-test and ANCOVA were employed to test the hypotheses at .05 level of significance. The findings of study among others revealed that: (i) students taught Basic Electricity using the guided inquiry instructional techniques had a higher mean score than students taught using the structured inquiry technique in Basic Electricity achievement test. (ii), the mean score of boys taught Basic Electricity using guided inquiry instructional technique was higher than the mean score of girls taught using the same guided inquiry instructional technique in the academic achievement test. Consequently, it was recommended among others that, (i) technical college teachers should adopt the use of the guided inquiry instructional technique for the teaching of Basic Electricity and (ii) the Ministry of Education and Administrators of technical colleges should always organize seminars, conferences and workshops to sensitize Basic Electricity and other technical teachers on the use of the guided inquiry instructional techniques in the Technical Colleges.
机译:这项研究旨在确定结构化和指导性探究教学技术对大专生在基础电力领域的学术成就的影响。提出了四个研究问题和三个零假设指导了研究。这项研究采用了涉及试验前,试验后,非等效对照组的准实验研究设计。研究的人群是来自Kwara State技术学院的233电气/电子职业2年级学生。这包括第一实验组的134名学生和第二实验组的99名学生。用于数据收集的工具是基本电力学术成就测试(BEAT)。明纳联邦工业大学的两名工业和技术教育专家(讲师)和一名科学教育专家对仪器进行了面部和内容有效性验证。使用Pearson的乘积矩相关技术,可获得的可靠性系数为0.88。均值用于回答研究问题,而t检验和ANCOVA则以0.05的显着性水平检验假设。研究结果表明:(i)在基础电力成绩测试中,使用指导性查询教学技术教授基础电力的学生的平均得分高于使用结构化询问技术进行教学的学生的平均得分。 (ii)在学业成绩测试中,使用指导性询问教学技术教基础电的男孩的平均得分高于使用相同的指导性询问教学技术教的女孩的平均得分。因此,建议除其他外,建议(i)技术学院的教师应采用基础探究教学法指导基础电力的教学;(ii)教育部和技术学院的管理者应始终组织研讨会,会议举办各种研讨会,以使基础电学和其他技术老师对在技术学院中使用引导式探究教学技术敏感。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号