Smaller Radius Width in Women With Distal Radius Fractures Compared to Women Without Fractures

摘要

Introduction Bone mineral density (BMD) measured using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is typically used to assess fracture risk. However, other factors such as bone size and the forward momentum of a fall (a function of body size) can also potentially influence fracture risk, but are understudied.?This report describes the characteristics of a cohort of?Caucasian pre- and postmenopausal women with distal radius fractures (DRF) after falling onto an outstretched hand. Methods The fracture cohort comprised entries in an institutional review board-approved registry of study patients who had had DXA scans.?For patients with DRF, the contralateral radius was scanned and BMD, T-scores (used to define bone status as normal, osteopenic, or osteoporotic), and radius width were recorded.?Generally, side-to-side (left-right) differences in bone size and BMD are small?and, hence, the contralateral radius was considered a surrogate for bone status of the fractured radius.?Apparently healthy women without fractures were used as race-, age-, and BMI-matched controls. Results Premenopausal women 50 years (mean age, 64 years) with DRF also had low radius width, but in contrast to the first group, this group had low peripheral and central BMD. Conclusions Women with DRF had contralateral?and presumably fractured radii?of?bone width smaller than matched controls.?As a group, these women were also overweight based on BMI.?The smaller radius width may increase the risk for fracture irrespective of BMD, especially since larger body size would result in greater inertial force when falling while ambulating.