首页> 外文期刊>Conservation Letters >Deforestation beyond borders: Addressing the disparity between production and consumption of global resources
【24h】

Deforestation beyond borders: Addressing the disparity between production and consumption of global resources

机译:跨国界的森林砍伐:解决全球资源生产与消费之间的差距

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

AbstractAnalysis of production and trade data from 176 countries reveals that patterns of wood product consumption and harvest differ significantly across income groups. Poorer countries’ consumption consists primarily of domestic fuelwood, yet between 1972 and 2009, low-income countries harvested 171 million hectares of forest products for export. High-income countries were the only group to act as net importers, suggesting that rich countries practice preservation within borders but appropriate resources from poorer countries to sustain consumption. Harvests in poorer countries do occur at relatively low harvest efficiencies, implying that losses may be attenuated via technological improvement. However, efficiency does not mitigate the effects of high consumption. Despite exceptionally high efficiencies, high-income countries are still responsible for just as much (or more) consumption-driven forest loss as any other group. These findings highlight the importance of reducing consumption and suggest that neither technocentric solutions nor national-level conservation policies are sufficient means to preserve global forests.
机译:摘要对来自176个国家/地区的生产和贸易数据的分析表明,不同收入类别的木材产品的消费和采伐方式存在显着差异。贫穷国家的消费主要包括国内薪柴,但是在1972年至2009年之间,低收入国家收获了超过1.71亿公顷的林产品用于出口。高收入国家是唯一的净进口国,这表明富裕国家在边界内实行保护,但较贫穷国家提供适当资源以维持消费。贫穷国家的收成确实以相对较低的收成效率发生,这意味着损失可能会通过技术进步而减少。但是,效率并不能减轻高消耗的影响。尽管效率异常高,但高收入国家仍然承担着与其他任何类别一样多(或更多)的消费驱动型森林损失。这些发现突出了减少消费的重要性,并表明以技术为中心的解决方案和国家一级的保护政策都不足以保护全球森林。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号