首页> 外文期刊>Cough >Simultaneous versus video counting of coughs in hypertonic cough challenges
【24h】

Simultaneous versus video counting of coughs in hypertonic cough challenges

机译:高渗性咳嗽挑战中同时和视频计数咳嗽

获取原文
       

摘要

Background The coughs occurring during cough provocation tests are usually counted at the same time when the test is being conducted, i.e., simultaneously. It is unknown whether cough counting from video recording might increase the accuracy of the cough counting. During recent years, cough challenges with hypertonic aerosols have been introduced. They often provoke very frequent coughing which may complicate the simultaneous cough counting. Objective To assess whether cough counting from video recording is superior to simultaneous cough counting in two different hypertonic cough challenges. Methods The analysis includes 82 hypertonic saline challenges performed on 66 subjects, providing 1984 observation minutes with both simultaneous and video cough counting. The cough sensitivity was expressed as the osmolality to provoke 15 cumulative coughs (CUM15). The analysis also includes 136 hypertonic histamine challenges performed on 114 subjects providing 5373 observation minutes with both simultaneous and video counting. The cough sensitivity was expressed as the cumulative number of coughs divided by the final histamine concentration administered (CCR). This challenge involved several additional measurements to cough counting. Results For the saline challenge, the mean difference between the counting types was 0.0 coughs per minute with 95% limits of agreement of -1.2 to 1.2 coughs per minute. For the hypertonic histamine challenge the respective figures were 0.3 (-1.9 to 2.5) coughs per minute. At high coughing frequency the video counts tended to outnumber the simultaneous counts. The counting type had no effect on the hypertonic saline CUM15 and only a marginal effect on its repeatability. On the contrary, video counting resulted to significantly higher hypertonic histamine CCR values than simultaneous counting (p < 0.001). Conclusion The agreement between simultaneous and video counting of coughs is generally good. However, as the coughing frequency increases, simultaneous counting may miss coughs, especially if the nurse has to share his/her attention to several activities simultaneously. Video recording is advisable for the hypertonic histamine challenge but unnecessary for the hypertonic saline challenge. To ensure reliable simultaneous cough counting, cough provocation tests should be performed in a quiet environment, applying as little unnecessary equipment and measurements as possible.
机译:背景技术在咳嗽激发试验期间发生的咳嗽通常在进行试验的同时,即同时计数。尚不清楚视频记录中的咳嗽计数是否会提高咳嗽计数的准确性。近年来,已经引入了高渗气雾剂的咳嗽挑战。他们经常引起非常频繁的咳嗽,这可能会使同时进行的咳嗽计数复杂化。目的评估在两种不同的高渗性咳嗽中,录像记录的咳嗽计数是否优于同时咳嗽计数。方法该分析包括对66位受试者进行的82次高渗盐水刺激,提供1984年的观察时间,同时进行视频咳嗽计数和视频计数。咳嗽敏感性表示为引起15次累积咳嗽的重量克分子渗透压浓度(CUM15)。该分析还包括对114位受试者进行的136次高渗组胺刺激,提供5373个观察分钟,同时进行视频计数。咳嗽敏感性表示为咳嗽的累积次数除以最终给予的组胺浓度(CCR)。这项挑战涉及对咳嗽计数的其他一些测量。结果对于盐水刺激,计数类型之间的平均差异为每分钟0.0咳嗽,一致性的95%限制为每分钟-1.2至1.2咳嗽。对于高渗组胺刺激,各自的数字为每分钟0.3(-1.9至2.5)咳嗽。在高咳嗽频率下,视频计数趋向于超过同时计数。计数类型对高渗盐水CUM15没有影响,而对它的可重复性只有很小的影响。相反,视频计数导致高渗组胺CCR值明显高于同时计数(p <0.001)。结论咳嗽同时计数和视频计数之间的一致性总体良好。但是,随着咳嗽频率的增加,同时计数可能会错过咳嗽,尤其是在护士必须同时分担多项活动的情况下。对于高渗组胺激发,建议录像,但对于高渗盐水激发,则不需要录像。为确保可靠地同时进行咳嗽计数,应在安静的环境中进行咳嗽激发试验,并尽可能少地使用不必要的设备和测量方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号