...
首页> 外文期刊>Behavioral Sciences >Four Bad Habits of Modern Psychologists
【24h】

Four Bad Habits of Modern Psychologists

机译:现代心理学家的四个不良习惯

获取原文
           

摘要

Four data sets from studies included in the Reproducibility Project were re-analyzed to demonstrate a number of flawed research practices (i.e., ?¢????bad habits?¢????) of modern psychology. Three of the four studies were successfully replicated, but re-analysis showed that in one study most of the participants responded in a manner inconsistent with the researchers?¢???? theoretical model. In the second study, the replicated effect was shown to be an experimental confound, and in the third study the replicated statistical effect was shown to be entirely trivial. The fourth study was an unsuccessful replication, yet re-analysis of the data showed that questioning the common assumptions of modern psychological measurement can lead to novel techniques of data analysis and potentially interesting findings missed by traditional methods of analysis. Considered together, these new analyses show that while it is true replication is a key feature of science, causal inference, modeling, and measurement are equally important and perhaps more fundamental to obtaining truly scientific knowledge of the natural world. It would therefore be prudent for psychologists to confront the limitations and flaws in their current analytical methods and research practices.
机译:重新分析了可再现性项目中包括的研究中的四个数据集,以证明现代心理学的许多有缺陷的研究实践(即“不良习惯”)。四项研究中的三项被成功复制,但重新分析表明,在一项研究中,大多数参与者的回答方式与研究人员不一致。理论模型。在第二项研究中,复制的效应被证明是实验上的混乱,而在第三项研究中,复制的统计效应被证明是完全微不足道的。第四项研究是没有成功的复制,但是对数据的重新分析表明,质疑现代心理测量的常见假设可能会导致数据分析的新技术和传统分析方法可能遗漏的有趣发现。综合考虑,这些新的分析表明,尽管复制确实是科学的关键特征,但因果推理,建模和测量对于获得自然界的真正科学知识同样重要,甚至更基础。因此,对于心理学家来说,在当前的分析方法和研究实践中面对局限性和缺陷是明智的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号