...
首页> 外文期刊>CNS neuroscience & therapeutics. >Optimal Magnetic Resonance Perfusion Thresholds Identifying Ischemic Penumbra and Infarct Core: A Chinese Population‐based Study
【24h】

Optimal Magnetic Resonance Perfusion Thresholds Identifying Ischemic Penumbra and Infarct Core: A Chinese Population‐based Study

机译:识别缺血性半影​​和梗塞核心的最佳磁共振灌注阈值:一项基于中国人群的研究

获取原文

摘要

Summary Aims To validate whether the optimal magnetic resonance perfusion ( MRP ) thresholds for ischemic penumbra and infarct core, between voxel and volume‐based analysis, are varied greatly among Chinese acute ischemic stroke patients. Materials and methods Acute ischemic stroke patients receiving intravenous thrombolysis within 6 h of onset that obtained acute and 24‐h MRP were reviewed. Patients with either no reperfusion (70% reperfusion at 24 h) were enrolled to investigate the ischemic penumbra and infarct core, respectively. The final infarct was assessed on 24‐h diffusion‐weighted imaging ( DWI ), which was retrospectively matched to the baseline perfusion‐weighted imaging ( PWI ) images by volume or voxel‐based analysis. The optimal thresholds that determined by each approach were compared. Results From June 2009 to Jan 2014, of 50 patients enrolled, 19 patients achieved no reperfusion, and 20 patients reperfused at 24 h. In patients with no reperfusion, Tmax 6 seconds was proved of the best agreement with the final infarct in both volumetric analysis (ratio: 1.05, 95% limits of agreement:?0.23 to 2.33, P 225% (ratio:2.4, 95% limits of agreement: ?6.5 to 11.4, P 5.6 seconds (sensitivity: 76.8%, specificity: 70.3%) performed most accurately in voxel‐based analysis. Conclusion Among Chinese acute stroke patients, volume of Tmax 6 seconds may precisely target ischemic penumbra tissue as good as voxel‐based analysis performed, albeit no concordant MRP parameter is found to accurately predict infarct core because reperfusion occurred within 24 h after thrombolysis fails to restrain the infarct growth.
机译:总结目的为了验证在中国急性缺血性卒中患者中,在体素分析和基于体积的分析之间,缺血半影和梗塞核心的最佳磁共振灌注(MRP)阈值是否存在很大差异。材料和方法对急性缺血性中风患者,在发病后6小时内接受静脉溶栓治疗,并获得了急性和24小时MRP。没有再灌注(24小时再灌注为70%)的患者入组,分别研究缺血性半影​​和梗死核心。最后的梗死在24小时弥散加权成像(DWI)上进行评估,通过体积或基于体素的分析与基线灌注加权成像(PWI)图像进行回顾性匹配。比较了每种方法确定的最佳阈值。结果2009年6月至2014年1月,在50例患者中,有19例未再灌注,而20例在24小时再灌注。在没有再灌注的患者中,在两个体积分析中,Tmax> 6秒与最终梗死的最佳一致性都得到了证实(比率:1.05,一致度的95%:? 0.23至2.33,P = 225%(比率:2.4,95%)一致性极限:?6.5至11.4,P 5.6秒(敏感性:76.8%,特异性:70.3%)在基于体素的分析中执行得最准确结论在中国急性卒中患者中,Tmax大于6秒的量可精确靶向缺血性半影尽管没有发现一致的MRP参数可以准确预测梗塞核心,但是组织中的组织与基于体素的分析一样好,因为在溶栓后24小时内发生了再灌注未能抑制梗塞的增长。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号