首页> 外文期刊>Complexity >Study of the Bullwhip Effect under Various Forecasting Methods in Electronics Supply Chain with Dual Retailers considering Market Share
【24h】

Study of the Bullwhip Effect under Various Forecasting Methods in Electronics Supply Chain with Dual Retailers considering Market Share

机译:考虑市场份额的双零售商电子供应链中各种预测方法下的牛鞭效应研究

获取原文
           

摘要

We establish in this paper a new two-stage supply chain with one manufacturer and two retailers which have a fixed market share in the mature and stable market with specific reference to consumer electronics industry. This paper offers insights into how the three forecasting methods affect the bullwhip effect considering the market share under the ARMA() demand process and the order-up-to inventory policy. We also discuss the stability of the order with the theory of entropy. In particular, we derive the expressions of bullwhip effect measure under the MMSE, MA, and ES methods and compare them by numerical simulations. Results show that the MA is always better in contrast to the ES for reducing the bullwhip effect in our supply chain model. When moving average coefficient is lower than a certain value, the MMSE method is the best for reducing the bullwhip effect; otherwise, the MA method is the best. Moreover, the larger the market share of the retailer with a long lead time is, the greater the bullwhip effect is, no matter what the forecasting method is.
机译:我们在本文中建立了一条新的两阶段供应链,其中有一个制造商和两个零售商,这些市场在成熟而稳定的市场中具有固定的市场份额,并专门针对消费电子行业。本文就ARMA()需求过程和按库存订购政策下的市场份额,提供了三种预测方法如何影响牛鞭效应的见解。我们还用熵理论讨论了阶的稳定性。特别是,我们推导了MMSE,MA和ES方法下牛鞭效应测度的表达式,并通过数值模拟对其进行了比较。结果表明,在我们的供应链模型中,MA相对于ES总是更好,以减少牛鞭效应。当移动平均系数低于一定值时,MMSE方法是减少牛鞭效应的最佳方法。否则,MA方法是最好的。而且,无论采用哪种预测方法,具有较长提前期的零售商的市场份额越大,牛鞭效应就越大。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号