首页> 外文期刊>College & Research Libraries >The Self as Subject: Autoethnographic Research into Identity, Culture, and Academic Librarianship . Anne-Marie Deitering, Robert Schroeder, and Richard Stoddart, eds. Chicago: American Library Association, 2017. 361p. Paper, $70.00 (ISBN 978-0-8389-8892-3).
【24h】

The Self as Subject: Autoethnographic Research into Identity, Culture, and Academic Librarianship . Anne-Marie Deitering, Robert Schroeder, and Richard Stoddart, eds. Chicago: American Library Association, 2017. 361p. Paper, $70.00 (ISBN 978-0-8389-8892-3).

机译:作为主体的自我:关于身份,文化和大学图书馆管理的自动民族志研究。 Anne-Marie Deitering,Robert Schroeder和Richard Stoddart编辑。芝加哥:美国图书馆协会,2017年。361页。纸,$ 70.00(ISBN 978-0-8389-8892-3)。

获取原文
       

摘要

Much of the professional literature in information and library science focuses on bringing new, sometimes significantly different, perspectives on what is already known. From reference services to information literacy instruction, collection development to patron services, innumerable works have been published with the intention of drawing the attention of the profession on how to enhance the work we do and challenging readers to think about that work differently. Instead of where much of the professional literature focuses upon the activities of librarians, what if the research were to focus upon the librarians themselves, and the general understanding that can be gained from the experiences of individuals? Librarians at varying stages of their respective careers view themselves and the profession differently, and the unique stories they tell may help others better understand their own attitudes about their work. Meanwhile, in recent years the matter of identity, how each of us sees (and defines) ourselves and how we wish to be perceived by others, has become increasingly complex. Matters of racial, ethnic, and sexual identity have moved from something socially constructed toward something much more personally defined. Specific to librarianship, the various and sundry librarian stereotypes are well known, and compounding those stereotypes, at least for academic librarians, is a general lack of knowledge about what we do. At the intersection of these two, disparate spheres is this collaborative effort to illuminate who academic librarians are, and how that impacts their professional endeavors. Using an autoethnographic methodology, they provide a unique and welcome approach to revealing some of the diversity, both professional and personal, to be found among librarians.
机译:信息和图书馆学中的许多专业文献都集中于对已知的东西提出新的,有时是截然不同的观点。从参考服务到信息素养指导,从馆藏开发到赞助服务,已经出版了无数作品,目的是引起专业人士对如何增强我们所做工作的关注,并挑战读者以不同的方式思考该作品。与其将专业文献集中在图书馆员的活动上,不如将研究的重点放在图书馆员本身上,以及可以从个人的经验中获得的一般理解,该怎么办?图书馆员在各自职业的不同阶段对自己和专业的看法不同,他们讲述的独特故事可能有助于其他人更好地了解自己对工作的态度。同时,近年来,身份问题,我们每个人如何看待(和定义)自己以及我们希望如何被他人感知,已变得越来越复杂。种族,种族和性认同的问题已经从社会建构的事物转变为更加个人定义的事物。对于图书馆员而言,各种各样的和各种各样的图书馆员刻板印象是众所周知的,并且至少对于学术图书馆员而言,将这些刻板印象加倍是对我们的工作普遍缺乏了解。在这两个领域的交汇处,这是一个相互协作的工作,旨在阐明谁是大学图书馆馆员,以及这对他们的职业生涯有何影响。通过使用民族志方法,他们提供了一种独特而受欢迎的方法来揭示图书馆员中某些专业和个人的多样性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号