首页> 外文期刊>College & Research Libraries >Who Speaks for Academic Librarians? Status and Satisfaction Comparisons between Unaffiliated and Unionized Librarians on Scholarship and Governance Issues
【24h】

Who Speaks for Academic Librarians? Status and Satisfaction Comparisons between Unaffiliated and Unionized Librarians on Scholarship and Governance Issues

机译:谁为大学图书馆员代言?非隶属和联合工会的图书馆员在学术和治理问题上的地位和满意度比较

获取原文
       

摘要

Scholarship and governance have emerged as the two most problematic aspects of faculty status for academic librarians. A comparative survey of 201 librarians, 126 unaffiliated and 75 unionized, revealed wide disparities, according to librarian status/title designations, in the opportunities afforded librarians to meet these requirements. The 34-item questionnaire focused on librariansa€? status/title characteristics, representation means, and institutional support for professional development, sabbaticals/leaves, travel, tuition, and participatory management. Salary information, as a measure of librarian equality to teaching faculty, also was solicited. The survey results confirm that the absence of uniform representation on these status issues has profound implications for the future of the faculty status model as a standard for academic librarianship.
机译:对于大学图书馆员来说,奖学金和治理已成为教师地位最棘手的两个方面。对201名图书馆员,126名无隶属关系和75名工会成员的比较调查显示,根据图书馆员的身份/职称的不同,图书馆员在满足这些要求方面的机会差距很大。共34项问卷,主要针对图书管理员。地位/职称的特征,代表方式以及对专业发展,休假/假期,旅行,学费和参与式管理的机构支持。还征求了薪资信息,以衡量教师与教师之间的平等程度。调查结果证实,在这些地位问题上缺乏统一的代表权,对于未来的学院地位模型(作为学术图书馆员的标准)具有深远的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号