首页> 外文期刊>College & Research Libraries >Who Speaks for Academic Librarians? Status and Satisfaction Comparisons between Unaffiliated and Unionized Librarians on Scholarship and Governance Issues
【24h】

Who Speaks for Academic Librarians? Status and Satisfaction Comparisons between Unaffiliated and Unionized Librarians on Scholarship and Governance Issues

机译:谁为大学图书馆员代言?非隶属和工会的图书馆员在奖学金和治理问题上的地位和满意度比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Scholarship and governance have emerged as the two most problematic aspects of faculty status for academic librarians, A comparative survey of 201 librarians, 126 unaffitiated and 75 unionized, revealed wide disparities, according to librarian status/title designations, in the opportunities afforded librarians to meet these requirements. The 34-item questionnaire focused on librarians' status/title characteristics, representation means, and institutional support for professional development, sabbaticals/leaves, travel, tuition, and participatory management. Salary Information, as admeasure of librarian equality to teaching faculty, also was solicited. The survey results confirm that the absence of uniform representation on these status issues has profound implications for the future of the faculty status model as a standard for academic librarianship.
机译:奖学金和管理已成为大学图书馆员教职地位中最棘手的两个方面。根据图书馆员地位/职称的比较,对201名图书馆员,126名无依恋者和75名工会成员的比较调查显示,在图书馆员见面机会方面存在巨大差异这些要求。该问卷共34项,重点关注图书馆员的身份/职称特征,代表方式以及机构对职业发展,休假/假期,旅行,学费和参与性管理的支持。还征求了薪资信息,以此作为教师与教学人员平等的手段。调查结果证实,在这些地位问题上缺乏统一的代表权对作为学术图书馆员标准的教师地位模型的未来具有深远的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号