...
首页> 外文期刊>Cogent Business & Management >Are there study mode differences in perceptions of university education service quality? Evidence from Zambia
【24h】

Are there study mode differences in perceptions of university education service quality? Evidence from Zambia

机译:学习模式对大学教育服务质量的看法是否存在差异?来自赞比亚的证据

获取原文

摘要

While a plethora of studies examines the relationships amongst university education service quality, customer satisfaction and loyalty, there is hardly any focus in the literature on study mode differences. Further, many developing country contexts such as Zambia are under-researched, limiting generalisability of prior research conclusions. Hence, the purpose of this paper is to examine university study mode differences in the under-researched context of Zambia. Specifically, it examines study mode differences among undergraduate students in relation to service quality dimensions and overall satisfaction. Based on a quantitative approach, survey data were collected from 824 students at a public university and analysed using correlation and one-way analyses of variance techniques. The findings indicate that while each of the five dimensions of service quality performance (tangibility, reliability, responsiveness, empathy and assurance) is significantly related to overall student satisfaction for all study modes, distance students were the most satisfied on all dimensions, followed by evening students and the least were full-time students. For scholars, administrators and policymakers, the study shows that the service performance model is a valid and useful framework for assessing and monitoring how the primary stakeholders form their service quality perceptions of higher education. However, the students with less contact with university staff and facilities seem to be more satisfied, a phenomenon that requires amelioration and reconnoitring. Since the study took place in one public university, increasing the sample base by covering more universities would improve generalisability.
机译:虽然大量研究检查了大学教育服务质量,客户满意度和忠诚度之间的关系,但文献中几乎没有关注学习方式的差异。此外,对许多发展中国家的环境(如赞比亚)的研究不足,限制了先前研究结论的普遍性。因此,本文的目的是研究在赞比亚研究不足的情况下大学学习方式的差异。具体来说,它研究了本科生在学习模式上与服务质量维度和整体满意度有关的差异。基于定量方法,从一所公立大学的824名学生中收集了调查数据,并使用相关性和方差分析的单向分析进行了分析。调查结果表明,虽然服务质量绩效的五个维度(有形,可靠性,响应能力,同情心和保证)中的每一个都与所有学习模式的总体学生满意度显着相关,但远程学生在所有维度上的满意度最高,其次是晚上学生和最少的是全日制学生。对于学者,行政人员和政策制定者而言,研究表明,服务绩效模型是评估和监控主要利益相关者如何形成其对高等教育服务质量观念的有效和有用的框架。但是,与大学教职员工和设施接触较少的学生似乎更满意,这种现象需要改善和重新思考。由于研究是在一所公立大学进行的,因此通过覆盖更多大学来增加样本库将提高可推广性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号