首页> 外文期刊>CoDAS >Comparative analysis of initial vocalizations of preterm and full-term infants with and without risk for development
【24h】

Comparative analysis of initial vocalizations of preterm and full-term infants with and without risk for development

机译:比较有和没有发育风险的早产儿和足月儿初始发声的比较分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Purpose To compare the evolution of vocalization in preterm and full-term infants, with and without risk for development, analyzing the possible association of sociodemographic, obstetric and psychosocial variables with vocalization. Methods The study sample consisted of 30 infants, aged 3 months and 1 day to 4 months and 29 days (Phase 1) and 6 months and 1 day to 7 months and 29 days (Phase 2), of both genders, with gestational age <37 weeks (preterm group) and >37 weeks (full-term group). The following instruments were used for data collection: Child Development Risk Indicators (IRDl), the Denver II Test, an interview on the experience of motherhood with sociodemographic, obstetric and psychosocial data, as well as filming of the mother-infant dyad at the two phases of the research. Footage was analyzed using the EUDICO Linguistic Annotator (ELAN) software and the results were statistically analyzed on the STATISTICA 9.0 software. Results The larger the total number of Phase II infantsa?? and mothersa?? vocalizations using motherese, the greater the number of IRDls present. Significant increase in vocalizations without motherese was also observed in Phase 2. Sociodemographic variables, gestational age, weight at birth, maternal schooling, and the Brazil Criterion did not directly affect the infantsa?? vocalization level. Conclusion Analysis of the infantsa?? vocalizations was sensitive to risk development and Child Development Risk Indicators in Phase 1; the Denver-language test was more effective in Phase 2. No influence of the sociodemographic variables was observed in the phases studied.
机译:目的比较有无发育风险的早产儿和足月儿发声的演变,分析社会人口统计学,产科和社会心理变量与发声的可能关系。方法研究样本包括30例年龄分别为3个月和1个月至4个月和29天(第1阶段)和6个月和1天至7个月和29天(第2阶段)的男女,胎龄< 37周(早产组)和> 37周(足额组)。以下工具用于数据收集:儿童发育风险指标(IRDl),丹佛II测试,关于具有社会人口统计学,产科和社会心理数据的孕产经验的访谈,以及在这两个地点拍摄母婴二联征研究阶段。使用EUDICO语言注释器(ELAN)软件分析素材,并在STATISTICA 9.0软件上对结果进行统计分析。结果Ⅱ期婴儿总数?和妈妈?使用母语发声时,IRD1的数量越多。在第二阶段中也观察到没有母亲的情况下发声的显着增加。社会人口统计学变量,胎龄,出生时的体重,产妇受教育程度以及巴西准则并未直接影响婴儿。发声水平。结论婴幼儿的分析在第一阶段,发声对风险发展和儿童发育风险指标敏感;丹佛语言测试在第2阶段更有效。在研究的各阶段中,未观察到社会人口统计学变量的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号