首页> 外文期刊>Collabra: Psychology >The Effect of Reading a Short Passage of Literary Fiction on Theory of Mind: A Replication of Kidd and Castano (2013)
【24h】

The Effect of Reading a Short Passage of Literary Fiction on Theory of Mind: A Replication of Kidd and Castano (2013)

机译:阅读短篇小说对精神理论的影响:基德和卡斯塔诺的复制品(2013)

获取原文
       

摘要

p class="p1"The results reported by Kidd and Castano (2013) indicated that reading a short passage of literary fiction improves theory of mind (ToM) relative to reading popular fiction. However, when we entered Kidd and Castano’s results in a emp/em-curve analysis, it turned out that the evidential value of their findings is low. It is good practice to back up a p-curve analysis of a single paper with an adequately powered direct replication of at least one of the studies in the emp/em-curve analysis. Therefore, we conducted a direct replication of the literary fiction condition and the popular fiction condition from Kidd and Castano’s Experiment 5 to scrutinize the effect of reading literary fiction on ToM. The results of this replication were largely consistent with Kidd and Castano’s original findings. Furthermore, we conducted a small-scale meta-analysis on the findings of the present study, those of Kidd and Castano and those reported in other published direct replications. The meta-analytic effect of reading literary fiction on ToM was small and non-significant but there was considerable heterogeneity between the included studies. The results of the present study and of the small-scale meta-analysis are discussed in the light of reading-times exclusion criteria as well as reliability and validity of ToM measures./p.
机译:class =“ p1”>基德和卡斯塔诺(Kidd and Castano,2013)报告的结果表明,相对于阅读通俗小说,阅读文学小说的短篇小说可以改善心理理论(ToM)。但是,当我们在 p 曲线分析中输入Kidd和Castano的结果时,发现他们的发现的证据价值很低。优良作法是使用至少 p 曲线分析中至少一项研究的足够能力直接复制来备份单篇论文的p曲线分析。因此,我们从Kidd和Castano的实验5中直接复制了文学小说的条件和流行小说的条件,以研究阅读文学小说对ToM的影响。复制的结果在很大程度上与Kidd和Castano的原始发现一致。此外,我们对本研究的发现,Kidd和Castano的发现以及其他已出版的直接复制的发现进行了小规模的荟萃分析。阅读文学小说对ToM的元分析作用很小且不显着,但纳入的研究之间存在相当大的异质性。结合阅读时间排除标准以及ToM量表的信度和效度,对本研究结果和小规模荟萃分析进行了探讨。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号