首页> 外文期刊>Cogent Social Sciences >A comparison of co-ethnic migrants in Japan and Singapore
【24h】

A comparison of co-ethnic migrants in Japan and Singapore

机译:日本和新加坡同族移民的比较

获取原文
       

摘要

This paper compares co-ethnic migrants in Japan and Singapore, namely: the Nikkeijin in Japan and Chinese nationals in Singapore. One striking difference between the two countries is that Singapore refers to migrants, both skilled and unskilled, as valuable human resources, while in Japan, the most influential discourse on migrants portrays them as an internal security threat. The Singaporean Government has made serious efforts in integrating skilled Chinese nationals, but in Japan, little has been done at the national level to integrate the Nikkeijin , even though they are potential long-term residents. Although the negative effects of having an ageing and declining population threaten both countries, Singapore has responded by prioritising immigration while Japan has not. Singapore may espouse multiculturalism, but the Singaporean Chinese have rejected Chinese nationals just the same. Singaporeans have rejected co-ethnic migrants primarily because they are outraged by the privileges offered to skilled Chinese nationals in employment, residency and citizenship matters. The Japanese, on the other hand, have rejected the Nikkeijin because despite their Japanese descent, they disturb Japanese homogeneity by bringing with them their language and culture from Latin America.
机译:本文比较了日本和新加坡的同族移民,即:日本的“日经津”和新加坡的中国人。两国之间的一个显着差异是,新加坡将熟练和不熟练的移民称为宝贵的人力资源,而在日本,对移民最有影响力的论述将其描述为内部安全威胁。新加坡政府在整合熟练的中国国民方面做出了认真的努力,但是在日本,即使他们是潜在的长期居民,在国家层面也没有采取任何措施来整合“ Nikkeijin”。尽管人口老龄化和人口减少带来的负面影响威胁到两国,但新加坡已通过优先考虑移民问题做出了回应,而日本则没有。新加坡可能拥护多元文化主义,但新加坡华人同样拒绝华人。新加坡人之所以拒绝同族移民,主要是因为他们对技能娴熟的中国公民在就业,居住和公民身份方面的特权感到愤怒。另一方面,日本人拒绝了《日经津》,因为尽管他们有日本血统,但他们通过带来拉丁美洲的语言和文化来扰乱日本的同质性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号