首页> 外文期刊>Clinical Medicine: Cardiology >The Threshold of Admission Glycemia as a Predictor of Adverse Events in Diabetic and Non-Diabetic Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome
【24h】

The Threshold of Admission Glycemia as a Predictor of Adverse Events in Diabetic and Non-Diabetic Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome

机译:糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者急性冠脉综合征的不良事件预测指标:糖血症阈值

获取原文
           

摘要

Recent studies indicated a high prevalence of hyperglycemia in non-diabetic patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, the threshold of admission glucose (AG) as a predictor of adverse events in ACS is unclear.Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the threshold of admission glucose (AG) as a predictor of adverse events including Major Acute Cardiac Events (MACE) and mortality, during the first week of admitting patients presenting with ACS.Material and Methods: The data of 551 patients with ACS were extracted and evaluated. Patients were stratified according to their blood glucose on admission into three groups: group 1: 7 mmol/L (n = 200, 36.3%) and group 2: 7 mmol/L and 15 mmol/L (n = 178, 32.3%) and group 3: 15 mmol/L (n = 173, 31.4%). Stress hyperglycemia was arbitrarily defined as AG levels 7 mmol/L (group 2 and 3). Patients with ACS were sub-divided into two groups: patients with unstable angina (UA, n = 285) and those with ST segment elevation myocardial Infarction (STEMI, n = 266) and data were analyzed separately using multiple regression analysis.Results: The mean age of patients was 59.7 ± 14.8 years and 63% were males. The overall mortality in the population was 8.5% (5.4% in STEMI and 3.1% in UA) patients. In STEMI patients, the odds ratio of stress hyperglycemia as predictor of mortality in group 3 compared with group 1 was 3.3 (CI 0.99–10.98, P 0.05), while in group 2 com- pared with group 1 was 2.4 (CI: 0.75–8.07, P = 0.065) after adjustment for age and sex. Similarly, in UA patients, the odds ratio of stress hyperglycemia in group 3 compared with group 1 was 2.7 (CI 0.37–18.98, P 0.05), while in group 2 compared with group 1 was 2.4 (CI: 0.4–15.2, P = 0.344) after adjustment for age and sex. The incidence of more than 2 MACE in both STEMI and UA patients was higher in group 3 compared with the other two groups. Regression analysis showed that history of DM, high level of LDL cholesterol, high level of HbA1c, and anterior infarction were significant predictors of adverse events while other risk factors such as BMI, history of hypertension and smoking were of no significance.Conclusion: This study indicates that the stress hyperglycemia on admission is a powerful predictor of increased major adverse events and hospital mortality in patients with acute coronary syndrome.
机译:最近的研究表明,在患有急性冠脉综合征(ACS)的非糖尿病患者中高血糖发生率很高。然而,尚不清楚准入糖(AG)的阈值是否可预测ACS的不良事件。目的:本研究的目的是评估准入糖(AG)的阈值作为不良事件(包括主要急性心脏事件)的预测指标(MACE)和死亡率,在入院接受ACS的患者的第一周。材料与方法:提取和评估551例ACS患者的数据。根据入院时的血糖将患者分为三组:第1组:7 mmol / L(n = 200,36.3%)和第2组:7 mmol / L和15 mmol / L(n = 178,32.3%)第3组:15 mmol / L(n = 173,31.4%)。应激性高血糖症被任意定义为AG水平7 mmol / L(第2组和第3组)。 ACS患者分为两类:不稳定型心绞痛(UA,n = 285)和ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI,n = 266),并使用多元回归分析分别分析数据。患者的平均年龄为59.7±14.8岁,其中63%为男性。人群的总死亡率为8.5%(STEMI为5.4%,UA为3.1%)。在STEMI患者中,第3组与第1组相比,压力高血糖作为死亡率的预测指标的比值比是3.3(CI 0.99-10.98,P 0.05),而第2组与第1组相比则是2.4(CI:0.75-CI 8.07,P = 0.065)。同样,在UA患者中,第3组与第1组相比,应激性高血糖的比值比为2.7(CI 0.37-18.98,P 0.05),而第2组与第1组相比,其应力高血糖的比值为2.4(CI:0.4-15.2,P = 0.344)。与其他两组相比,第3组STEMI和UA患者中超过2个MACE的发生率更高。回归分析表明,糖尿病史,低密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平高,HbA1c高水平和前部梗死是不良事件的重要预测指标,而其他危险因素,例如体重指数,高血压史和吸烟史则无意义。提示入院时应激性高血糖是急性冠脉综合征患者主要不良事件增加和医院死亡率增加的有力预测指标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号