首页> 外文期刊>Clinical ophthalmology >Anterior segment biometry using ultrasound biomicroscopy and the Artemis-2 very high frequency ultrasound scanner
【24h】

Anterior segment biometry using ultrasound biomicroscopy and the Artemis-2 very high frequency ultrasound scanner

机译:使用超声生物显微镜和Artemis-2超高频超声扫描仪进行前节生物测定

获取原文
           

摘要

Purpose: To compare the precision of anterior chamber angle (ACA) and anterior chamber depth (ACD) measurements taken with ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) and the Artemis-2 Very High Frequency Ultrasound Scanner (VHFUS) in normal subjects.Design: Prospective study.Methods: We randomly selected one eye from each of 59 normal subjects in this study. Two subjects dropped out of the study; the associated data were excluded from analysis. ACA and ACD measurements were obtained using the VHFUS and the UBM. The results were compared statistically using repeated-measures analysis of variance for the intraobserver repeatability, unpaired t-test, and limits of agreement.Results: The average ACA values for the UBM and the VHFUS (±standard deviation) were 41.83° ± 5.03° and 33.36° ± 6.03°, respectively. The average ACD values were 2.96 ± 0.34 mm and 2.87 ± 0.31 mm. The intraobserver repeatability analysis of variance P-values for ACA and ACD measurements using UBM were 0.10 and 0.68, respectively; for the Artemis-2 VHFUS, the respective values were 0.68 and 0.09. The difference in ACA measurements was statistically significant (t = 8.41; P < 0.0001), while the difference in ACD values was not (t = 1.51; P < 0.13). The mean ACA difference was 8.50° ± 2.50°, and the limits of agreement were +13.30° to ?3.60°. The mean ACD difference was 0.09 ± 0.27 mm, and the limits of agreement ranged from 0.61 mm to ?0.43 mm. The mean difference percentage of ACD was 3.1% for both instruments.Conclusion: In case of the ACD, both instruments can be used interchangeably; however, with the ACA instruments, they cannot be used interchangeably.
机译:目的:比较在正常受试者中超声生物显微镜(UBM)和Artemis-2超高频超声扫描仪(VHFUS)进行的前房角(ACA)和前房深度(ACD)测量的精度设计:前瞻性研究。方法:在本研究中,我们从59名正常受试者中随机选择一只眼睛。两个受试者退出研究;相关数据从分析中排除。使用VHFUS和UBM获得ACA和ACD测量值。使用观察者内重复性,不成对t检验和一致性极限的方差重复测量分析对结果进行统计学比较。结果:UBM和VHFUS的平均ACA值为41.83°±5.03°和33.36°±6.03°。平均ACD值为2.96±0.34 mm和2.87±0.31 mm。使用UBM进行的ACA和ACD测量的方差P值的观察者内重复性分析分别为0.10和0.68;对于Artemis-2 VHFUS,分别为0.68和0.09。 ACA测量值的差异具有统计学意义(t = 8.41; P <0.0001),而ACD值的差异则不明显(t = 1.51; P <0.13)。平均ACA差为8.50°±2.50°,一致极限为+ 13.30°至?3.60°。平均ACD差为0.09±0.27 mm,一致极限在0.61 mm至0.43 mm之间。两种仪器的ACD平均差异百分比为3.1%。结论:对于ACD,两种仪器可以互换使用;但是,对于ACA仪器,它们不能互换使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号