首页> 外文期刊>Clinical ophthalmology >Informed consent in refractive surgery: in-person vs telemedicine approach
【24h】

Informed consent in refractive surgery: in-person vs telemedicine approach

机译:屈光手术中的知情同意:面对面与远程医疗方法

获取原文
           

摘要

Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the quality of consent process in refractive surgery between patients who had a preoperative consent discussion with the surgeon using a telemedicine approach and those who had a face-to-face discussion. Methods: Patients treated between January and December 2017 (8,184 laser vision correction [LVC] and 3,754 refractive lens exchange [RLE] patients) that attended day 1 and 1-month postoperative visit were retrospectively reviewed. Preoperative consent preparation included a consultation with an optometrist, observation of an educational video, and written information. Patients then selected either a face-to-face appointment with their surgeon (in-clinic group) or a telemedicine appointment (remote group) for their consent discussion, according to their preference. Patient experience questionnaire and clinical data were included in a multivariate model to explore factors associated with consent quality. Results: Prior to surgery, 80.1% of LVC and 47.9% of RLE patients selected remote consent. Of all LVC patients, 97.5% of in-clinic and 98.3% of remote patients responded that they were adequately consented for surgery ( P =0.04). Similar percentages in the RLE group were 97.6% for in-clinic and 97.9% for remote patients ( P =0.47). In a multivariate model, the major predictor of patient’s satisfaction with the consent process was postoperative satisfaction with visual acuity, responsible for 80.4% of variance explained by the model. Other significant contributors were postoperative visual phenomena and dry eyes, difficulty with night driving, close-up and distance vision, postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity, change in corrected distance visual acuity, and satisfaction with the surgeon’s approach. The type of consent (remote or in-clinic) had no impact on patient’s perception of consent quality in the regression model. Conclusion: The majority of patients opted for telemedicine-assisted consent. Those who chose it were equally satisfied as those who had a face-to-face meeting with their surgeon. Dissatisfaction with surgical outcome was the major factor affecting patient’s perception of consent quality, regardless of the method of their consent.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是比较在进行术前同意与外科医生进行远程医疗讨论的患者与进行面对面讨论的患者之间的屈光手术同意过程的质量。方法:回顾性分析2017年1月至12月期间接受治疗的患者(8184例激光视力矫正[LVC]和3754例屈光性晶状体置换[RLE]患者)。术前同意书的准备工作包括与验光师进行会诊,观看教育视频和书面信息。然后,患者根据自己的喜好选择与外科医生面对面的约会(诊所组)或远程医疗约会(远程组)。在多变量模型中包括患者经验调查表和临床数据,以探讨与知情同意质量相关的因素。结果:手术前,有80.1%的LVC和47.9%的RLE患者选择了远程同意。在所有LVC患者中,有97.5%的门诊患者和98.3%的偏远患者对他们的手术同意表示满意(P = 0.04)。在RLE组中,门诊患者的比例为97.6%,偏远患者的比例为97.9%(P = 0.47)。在多变量模型中,患者对同意过程满意的主要预测指标是术后视敏度,该模型解释的变异率为80.4%。其他重要原因包括术后视觉现象和干眼症,夜间驾驶困难,近距离和远距离视力,术后未矫正的远距离视力,矫正的远距离视力的变化以及对手术方法的满意度。在回归模型中,同意类型(远程或诊所)对患者对同意质量的看法没有影响。结论:大多数患者选择了远程医疗辅助同意。选择它的人和与外科医生面对面开会的人一样满意。不管患者的同意方法如何,对手术结果的不满意是影响患者对同意质量的看法的主要因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号