...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical ophthalmology >Meta-analysis comparing same-day versus delayed vitrectomy clinical outcomes for?intravitreal retained lens fragments after age-related cataract surgery
【24h】

Meta-analysis comparing same-day versus delayed vitrectomy clinical outcomes for?intravitreal retained lens fragments after age-related cataract surgery

机译:荟萃分析比较年龄相关性白内障手术后玻璃体内保留晶状体碎片的当天和延迟玻璃体切除术的临床结局

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Purpose/design: We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the risk difference of clinical outcomes for same-day (SD) vs delayed (DEL) pars plana vitrectomy (PPV).Methods: We searched MEDLINE (English; January 1, 1985 to July 16, 2013) and article reference lists, for patients with crystalline retained lens fragments and discussion of SD-PPV vs DEL-PPV. For the meta-analysis, articles needed the number of patients receiving SD-PPV and DEL-PPV, and the number, in each group, who experienced one or more of the outcomes: not good visual acuity (VA) (<20/40), bad VA (≤20/200), retinal detachment, increased intraocular pressure/glaucoma, intraocular infection/inflammation, cystoid macular edema, and corneal edema.Results: Of 304 articles identified, 23 provided data for the meta-analysis. Results were mixed, indicating 1) neither vitrectomy time produced better outcomes in all studies (not good VA risk difference =10.3% [positive numbers favored SD-PPV; negative numbers favored DEL-PPV], 95% confidence interval [CI] = [-0.4% to 21.0%], P=0.059; and bad VA risk difference =-0.3%, 95% CI = [-10.7% to 10.1%], P=0.953); 2) better outcomes with immediate SD-PPV compared with all DEL-PPV (not good VA risk difference =16.2%, 95% CI = [0.8% to 31.5%], P=0.039; and bad VA risk difference =8.5%; 95% CI = [0.8% to 16.2%], P=0.030); and 3) immediate SD-PPV and prompt DEL-PPV (3 to 14 days after cataract surgery) had no significant differences and so may produce similar outcomes (not good VA risk differences range = [-19.9% to 6.5%], 95% CI?= [-59.9% to 36.4%]; and bad VA risk differences range = [-6.9% to 7.4%], 95% CI = [-33.1% to 31.8%]).Conclusion: Perhaps SD-PPV should be limited to facilities at which a vitreoretinal surgeon is immediately available. Otherwise, these results support referring a patient with retained lens fragments promptly to a vitreoretinal surgeon but do not support interfacility transport for SD-PPV.
机译:目的/设计:我们旨在进行系统的回顾和荟萃分析,比较当日(SD)与延迟(DEL)平板玻璃体切除术(PPV)的临床结局的风险差异。方法:搜索MEDLINE(英语; 1月(1985年1月1日至2013年7月16日)和文章参考清单,针对具有晶体保留晶状体碎片的患者,以及SD-PPV与DEL-PPV的讨论。对于荟萃分析,文章需要接受SD-PPV和DEL-PPV的患者人数,以及每组中经历一种或多种结果的人数:视力不好(VA)(<20/40 ),不良视力(≤20/ 200),视网膜脱离,眼压/青光眼增加,眼内感染/炎症,囊状黄斑水肿和角膜水肿。结果:在304篇文章中,有23篇为荟萃分析提供了数据。结果喜忧参半,这表明:1)在所有研究中,玻璃体切除术的时间均未达到更好的结果(VA风险差不佳= 10.3%[正数偏向SD-PPV;负数偏向DEL-PPV],95%置信区间[CI] = [ -0.4%至21.0%],P = 0.059;不良VA风险差= -0.3%,95%CI = [-10.7%至10.1%],P = 0.953); 2)与所有DEL-PPV相比,立即SD-PPV的预后更好(不良VA风险差异= 16.2%,95%CI = [0.8%至31.5%],P = 0.039;不良VA风险差异= 8.5%; 95%CI = [0.8%至16.2%],P = 0.030);和3)立即SD-PPV和即时DEL-PPV(白内障手术后3到14天)没有明显差异,因此可能产生相似的结果(不良VA风险差异范围= [-19.9%至6.5%],95% CI?= [-59.9%至36.4%];不良的VA风险差异范围= [-6.9%至7.4%],95%CI = [-33.1%至31.8%])。结论:也许SD-PPV应该是仅限于可立即使用玻璃体视网膜外科医生的设施。否则,这些结果支持将保留了晶状体碎片的患者及时转诊给玻璃体视网膜外科医生,但不支持SD-PPV的设施间运输。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号