首页> 外文期刊>Clinical ophthalmology >Patient adherence and persistence with topical ocular hypotensive therapy in real-world practice: a comparison of bimatoprost 0.01% and travoprost Z 0.004% ophthalmic solutions
【24h】

Patient adherence and persistence with topical ocular hypotensive therapy in real-world practice: a comparison of bimatoprost 0.01% and travoprost Z 0.004% ophthalmic solutions

机译:现实世界中使用局部降压疗法对患者的依从性和持久性:比马前列素0.01%和travoprost Z 0.004%眼药水的比较

获取原文
       

摘要

Background: Effective control of intraocular pressure is predicated upon patient compliance with pharmacotherapy. We compared patient adherence and persistence with two new ocular hypotensive formulations, using real-world utilization data. Methods: This observational cohort study employed pharmacy claims data from the Source? Lx (Wolters Kluwer Pharma Solutions) database. Patients with an initial (index) prescription for topical bimatoprost 0.01% or travoprost Z (April to June 2011) and no claim for ophthalmic prostaglandin or prostamide analogs within the previous 18 months were identified. Treatment adherence was expressed as proportion of days covered with study medication during the first 365 days after the index prescription. Treatment persistence with study medication was assessed over the first 12 months using Kaplan–Meier survival analyses, allowing a maximum 30-day gap for prescription refill. Treatment status was determined monthly over this period. Results: A total of 12,985 patients were assessed for treatment adherence, and 10,470 for treatment persistence. Adherence was better with bimatoprost 0.01% than with travoprost Z (mean proportion of days covered 0.540 versus [vs] 0.486, P0.80) with bimatoprost 0.01% than travoprost Z (29.1% vs 22.3%, P<0.001). Continuous 12-month persistence was higher with bimatoprost 0.01% than with travoprost Z (29.5% vs 24.2%, P<0.001). At month 12, more patients were on treatment with bimatoprost 0.01% than travoprost Z (48.8% vs 45.7%, P<0.01). Similar findings were demonstrated in cohorts of ocular hypotensive treatment-na?ve patients, branded latanoprost switchers, and older patients (age ≥65 years), and after inclusion of patient characteristics as covariates. Conclusion: For patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension, bimatoprost 0.01% offers compliance advantages over travoprost Z.
机译:背景:根据患者对药物治疗的依从性,可以有效控制眼内压。我们使用实际使用率数据将患者的依从性和持续性与两种新的眼用降压制剂进行了比较。方法:该观察性队列研究采用了来自来源的药房索赔数据? Lx(Wolters Kluwer Pharma Solutions)数据库。最初(指数)处方中使用局部Bimatoprost 0.01%或travoprost Z的患者(2011年4月至2011年6月),且在过去18个月内未主张使用眼用前列腺素或前列腺素类似物的患者。治疗依从性表示为指数处方后前365天被研究药物覆盖的天数比例。在最初的12个月中,使用Kaplan–Meier生存分析评估了研究药物的治疗持久性,允许最大30天的补药间隔。在此期间每月确定治疗状态。结果:共评估了12,985例患者的治疗依从性,评估了10,470例患者的治疗持久性。比马前列素0.01%的依从性比travoprost Z更好(平均天数比0.540对[vs] 0.486,P0.80),比travoprost Z更好(29.1%对22.3%,P <0.001)。比马前列素0.01%的连续12个月持久性高于曲妥前列素Z(29.5%比24.2%,P <0.001)。在第12个月,接受比马前列素0.01%治疗的患者多于曲伐前列素Z(48.8%对45.7%,P <0.01)。在未进行过眼部降压治疗的患者,品牌的拉坦前列素转换组和年龄较大的患者(年龄≥65岁)中,以及在将患者特征纳入协变量后,也发现了类似的结果。结论:对于青光眼或高眼压症患者,比马前列素0.01%比travoprost Z具有顺应性优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号