...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinics >Comparison of different speech tasks among adults who stutter and adults who do not stutter
【24h】

Comparison of different speech tasks among adults who stutter and adults who do not stutter

机译:口吃成人和不口吃成人不同语音任务的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: In this study, we compared the performance of both fluent speakers and people who stutter in three different speaking situations: monologue speech, oral reading and choral reading. This study follows the assumption that the neuromotor control of speech can be influenced by external auditory stimuli in both speakers who stutter and speakers who do not stutter. METHOD: Seventeen adults who stutter and seventeen adults who do not stutter were assessed in three speaking tasks: monologue, oral reading (solo reading aloud) and choral reading (reading in unison with the evaluator). Speech fluency and rate were measured for each task. RESULTS: The participants who stuttered had a lower frequency of stuttering during choral reading than during monologue and oral reading. CONCLUSIONS: According to the dual premotor system model, choral speech enhanced fluency by providing external cues for the timing of each syllable compensating for deficient internal cues.
机译:目的:在这项研究中,我们比较了会说方言的人和在三种不同口语下口吃的人的表现:独白,口语和合唱。这项研究遵循这样的假设:口吃的说话者和不口吃的说话者都可以通过外部听觉刺激来影响语音的神经运动控制。方法:对17个口吃的成年人和17个不口吃的成年人进行了三种口语测试:独白,口头阅读(大声朗读)和合唱朗读(与评估者一致阅读)。测量每个任务的语音流利度和速率。结果:口吃的参与者在合唱阅读中的口吃频率要比独白和口头阅读时的口吃频率低。结论:根据双前运动系统模型,合唱语音通过为每个音节的时机提供外部提示以补偿内部提示不足,从而提高了流畅度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号