首页> 外文期刊>Clinical ophthalmology >Comparison of the biometric measurements calculated with Zeiss IOL-Master and WaveLight OB-820
【24h】

Comparison of the biometric measurements calculated with Zeiss IOL-Master and WaveLight OB-820

机译:蔡司IOL-Master和WaveLight OB-820计算的生物特征测量结果的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: The primary objective of this study was to investigate the level of agreement between IOL-Master and OB-820 ocular biometers. Materials and methods: In this prospective randomized case series, we measured the anterior chamber depth (ACD), the axial length (AL), the corneal radii (R1, R2), the ratio of mean corneal radius and spherical equivalent and the corneal astigmatism (cylinder [Cyl]) before and after cataract extraction surgery. Results: Significant differences between pre- and postoperative data were observed for ACD for both biometric devices ( P <0.01) and Cyl parameter in IOL-Master. Range and 95% limits of agreement (LoA) were clinically significantly different for AL parameter pre- and postoperatively and for R2 and radius and spherical equivalent postoperatively ( P <0.001). The rest of the parameters presented sufficient 95% LoA, which imply good agreement. Conclusion: In clinical practice, the IOL-master and OB-820 should not be used interchangeably due to discrepancy in the important AL parameter. Both biometers may provide consistent results regarding Cyl, ACD and R1.
机译:背景:这项研究的主要目的是调查IOL-Master和OB-820眼用生物测定仪之间的一致性水平。材料和方法:在此前瞻性随机病例系列中,我们测量了前房深度(ACD),轴向长度(AL),角膜半径(R1,R2),平均角膜半径与球面当量之比以及角膜散光(圆柱[Cyl])在白内障摘除手术前后。结果:对于两种生物测定设备,ACD的术前和术后数据之间均存在显着差异(P <0.01)和IOL-Master中的Cyl参数。术前和术后AL参数以及术后R2,radius半径和球等效量在临床上的一致性范围(LoA)和95%界线有显着差异(P <0.001)。其余参数显示出足够的95%LoA,这表明一致性好。结论:在临床实践中,由于重要的AL参数存在差异,IOL-master和OB-820不应互换使用。两种生物测定仪均可提供有关Cyl,ACD和R1的一致结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号