首页> 外文期刊>Clinical ophthalmology >Comparison between bilateral implantation of a trifocal intraocular lens and blended implantation of two bifocal intraocular lenses
【24h】

Comparison between bilateral implantation of a trifocal intraocular lens and blended implantation of two bifocal intraocular lenses

机译:三焦点人工晶状体双侧植入与两个焦点双眼混晶混合植入的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Purpose: To compare visual outcomes and performance between bilateral implantation of a diffractive trifocal intraocular lens (IOL) Acrysof?PanOptix? TFNT00 and blended implantation of two different near add power bifocal IOLs: Acrysof? Restor? SV25T0 in dominant eye and Acrysof? Restor? SN6AD1 in the nondominant eye. Methods: This prospective, nonrandomized, consecutive and comparative study assessed 20 patients (40 eyes) who had bilateral cataract surgery performed using the IOLs described. Patients were divided into groups, bilateral trifocal implant and blended implant. Evaluation included measurement of binocular uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity at 4?m (UDVA, CDVA) and uncorrected intermediate (60 cm) and near (at 40 cm) visual acuity; contrast sensitivity (CS) and visual defocus curve. Results: Postoperative CDVA comparison showed no statistical significance between groups. UDVA was significantly better in the trifocal groups. Under photopic conditions, the trifocal group had better CS in higher frequencies with and without glare. The binocular defocus curve demonstrated a trifocal behavior in both groups, with the bilateral trifocal group exhibiting better performance for intermediate vision. Conclusion: Both lens combinations were able to provide good near, intermediate and distance vision, with the trifocal group showing significantly better performance at intermediate distances and better CS under photopic conditions.
机译:目的:比较衍射三焦点人工晶状体(IOL)Acrysof ? PanOptix ? TFNT00的双侧植入与两种不同的近焦度双焦点IOL的混合植入之间的视觉效果和性能:优势眼中的Acrysof ? Restor ? SV25T0,非优势眼中的Acrysof ? Restor ? SN6AD1。方法:这项前瞻性,非随机,连续和比较研究评估了20例(40眼)使用所述IOL进行双侧白内障手术的患者。患者分为两组,即双侧三焦点植入物和混合植入物。评估包括在4?m(UDVA,CDVA)和未校正的中间(60 cm)和近(40 cm)的双眼未矫正和矫正远视力的测量;对比敏感度(CS)和视觉散焦曲线。结果:术后CDVA比较显示两组之间无统计学意义。三焦点组的UDVA明显更好。在明视条件下,三焦点组在有和没有眩光的较高频率下具有更好的CS。双眼散焦曲线在两组中均表现出三焦点行为,而双侧三焦点组在中视方面表现出更好的表现。结论:这两种镜片组合都能提供良好的近,中和远视力,三焦点组在中距离下表现出明显更好的性能,在明暗条件下表现出更好的CS。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号