首页> 外文期刊>Clinical and vaccine immunology: CVI >Optimal Blood Mononuclear Cell Isolation Procedures for Gamma Interferon Enzyme-Linked Immunospot Testing of Healthy Swedish and Tanzanian Subjects
【24h】

Optimal Blood Mononuclear Cell Isolation Procedures for Gamma Interferon Enzyme-Linked Immunospot Testing of Healthy Swedish and Tanzanian Subjects

机译:瑞典和坦桑尼亚健康受试者的γ干扰素酶联免疫斑点测试的最佳血液单核细胞分离程序

获取原文
           

摘要

Determination of antigen-specific T-cell responses is an important part of vaccine assessment. High levels of recovery, viability, and functionality of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) are essential for reliable assessment of cell-mediated immune responses. Here, we sought to find the cell preparation technique best suited for two clinical vaccine trial sites: Stockholm, Sweden, and Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Standard Ficoll-Paque gradient centrifugation, BD Vacutainer cell preparation tube (CPT), and Greiner Bio-One LeucoSep tube techniques were tested. Cell yield and viability were recorded. Gamma interferon (IFN-γ) enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT) testing was used to assess cell functionality. No differences in mean recovery or mean viability of fresh PBMCs were observed between Ficoll-Paque gradient centrifugation and CPT techniques as used in Stockholm. In Dar es Salaam, recovery of PBMCs isolated by use of the Ficoll-Paque gradient technique was higher than that seen with CPT (1.58 ± 0.6 versus 1.34 ± 0.4 million cells/ml of blood [P = 0.0469]), and the viability of PBMCs processed by Ficoll-Paque gradient was higher than that seen with CPT-purified cells (95.8% ± 2.3% versus 92.6% ± 4.8% [P = 0.0081]). Furthermore, LeucoSep cell separation gave higher levels of yield (1.10 ± 0.3 versus 0.92 ± 0.3 million cells/ml of blood [P = 0.0022]) and viability (95.7% ± 2.0% versus 93.4% ± 3.2% [P = 0.0012]) than Ficoll-Paque cell separation. The cells purified by the different techniques at the two sites performed equally well in IFN-γ ELISPOT assays. Both techniques generated cell preparations with excellent yield, viability, and functionality in Stockholm. In Dar es Salaam, CPT did not perform as well as Ficoll-Paque separation. In a subsequent comparison, LeucoSep performed better than Ficoll-Paque separation. Our findings emphasize the need for on-site assessment of PBMC purification techniques for optimal evaluation of cell-mediated immune responses.
机译:抗原特异性T细胞反应的确定是疫苗评估的重要组成部分。外周血单个核细胞(PBMC)的高水平恢复,活力和功能对于可靠地评估细胞介导的免疫反应至关重要。在这里,我们寻求找到最适合两个临床疫苗试验地点的细胞制备技术:瑞典斯德哥尔摩和坦桑尼亚达累斯萨拉姆。测试了标准Ficoll-Paque梯度离心,BD Vacutainer细胞制备管(CPT)和Greiner Bio-One LeucoSep管技术。记录细胞产量和活力。 γ干扰素(IFN-γ)酶联免疫斑点(ELISPOT)测试用于评估细胞功能。在斯德哥尔摩使用的Ficoll-Paque梯度离心和CPT技术之间,未观察到新鲜PBMC的平均回收率或平均生存力的差异。在达累斯萨拉姆,使用Ficoll-Paque梯度技术分离的PBMC的回收率高于CPT(1.58±0.6对1.34±0.4百万细胞/ ml血液[ P = 0.0469 ]),并且通过Ficoll-Paque梯度处理的PBMC的存活率高于CPT纯化的细胞(95.8%±2.3%对92.6%±4.8%[ P = 0.0081])。此外,LeucoSep细胞分离可提供更高的产量水平(1.10±0.3对0.92±0.3百万细胞/ ml血液[ P = 0.0022])和生存力(95.7%±2.0%对93.4%±3.2) %[ P = 0.0012])。通过不同技术在两个位点纯化的细胞在IFN-γELISPOT分析中表现相同。两种技术在斯德哥尔摩产生的细胞制备均具有出色的产量,活力和功能性。在达累斯萨拉姆,CPT的表现不及Ficoll-Paque分离。在随后的比较中,LeucoSep的性能优于Ficoll-Paque分离。我们的发现强调需要对PBMC纯化技术进行现场评估,以最佳评估细胞介导的免疫反应。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号