首页> 外文期刊>Clinical Interventions in Aging >Comparison of three tools for predicting primary osteoporosis in an elderly male population in Beijing: a cross-sectional study
【24h】

Comparison of three tools for predicting primary osteoporosis in an elderly male population in Beijing: a cross-sectional study

机译:三种预测北京老年男性原发性骨质疏松症的工具的比较:一项横断面研究

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Purpose: In this cross-sectional study, three clinical tools, the Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool for Asians (OSTA), Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) without bone mineral density (BMD), and body mass index (BMI), for predicting primary osteoporosis (OP) were compared and ideal thresholds for omission of screening BMD were proposed in a community-dwelling elderly Han Beijing male population. Patients and methods: A total of 1,349 community-dwelling elderly Han Beijing males aged?≥50?years were enrolled in this study. All subjects completed a questionnaire and measured BMD by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Osteoporosis was defined as a T-score of -2.5 SD or lower than that of the average young adult in different diagnostic criteria (lumbar spine [L1–L4], femoral neck, total hip, worst hip, and World Health Organization [WHO]). FRAX without BMD, OSTA, and BMI were assessed for predicting OP by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Sensitivity, specificity, and areas under the ROC curves (AUCs) were determined. Ideal thresholds for omission of screening BMD were proposed. Results: The prevalence of OP ranged from 1.8% to 12.8% according to different diagnostic criteria. This study showed that the BMI has highest discriminating ability. The AUC of FRAX without BMD ranged from 0.536 to 0.630, which suggested limiting predictive value for identifying OP in elderly Beijing male. The AUCs of BMI (0.801–0.880) were slightly better than OSTA (0.722–0.874) in predicting OP at all sites. The AUC of BMI to identify OP in worst hip was 0.824, yielding a sensitivity of 84.8% and a specificity of 64.4%. 40% of participants on BMD measurements saved only 0.1%–2.7% missed OP. Compared to OSTA and FRAX without BMD, the BMI got the best predictive value for OP. Conclusion: BMI may be a simple and effective tool for identifying OP in the elderly male population in Beijing to omit BMD screening reasonably.
机译:目的:在这项横断面研究中,使用三种临床工具进行预测:亚洲人骨质疏松症自我评估工具(OSTA),无骨矿物质密度(BMD)的骨折风险评估工具(FRAX)和体重指数(BMI)对原发性骨质疏松症(OP)进行了比较,并提出了在北京汉城汉族男性社区中人群筛检BMD的理想阈值。患者和方法:本研究共纳入1349名≥50岁的北京汉族社区居民。所有受试者均完成问卷并通过双能X线吸收法(DXA)测量BMD。骨质疏松症的定义是,在不同的诊断标准(腰椎[L1-L4],股骨颈,全髋关节,最坏的髋关节和世界卫生组织[WHO])中,T得分为-2.5 SD或低于平均年轻成年人的T得分。 )。通过接收器工作特性(ROC)曲线评估了没有BMD,OSTA和BMI的FRAX来预测OP。确定了灵敏度,特异性和ROC曲线下的面积(AUC)。提出了筛查BMD的理想阈值。结果:根据不同的诊断标准,OP的患病率在1.8%至12.8%之间。这项研究表明,BMI具有最高的识别能力。没有BMD的FRAX的AUC值在0.536至0.630之间,这表明鉴定北京老龄男性OP的预测价值有限。在预测所有部位的OP时,BMI的AUC(0.801–0.880)略好于OSTA(0.722–0.874)。 BMI识别最严重髋关节OP的AUC为0.824,灵敏度为84.8%,特异性为64.4%。 BMD测量中40%的参与者仅节省了0.1%–2.7%的OP遗漏。与没有BMD的OSTA和FRAX相比,BMI对OP的预测价值最高。结论:BMI可能是鉴定北京老年男性人群OP的一种简单有效的工具,可以合理地省略BMD筛查。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号