首页> 外文期刊>Climate of the Past Discussions >On-line and off-line data assimilation of palaeoclimate proxy data into a GCM using ensemble member selection
【24h】

On-line and off-line data assimilation of palaeoclimate proxy data into a GCM using ensemble member selection

机译:使用集合成员选择将古气候代理数据在线和离线数据同化为GCM

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Different ensemble-based data assimilation (DA) approaches for palaeoclimate reconstructions have been recently followed, but no systematic comparison among them has been attempted. We compare an off-line and an on-line ensemble-based method, with the testing period being the 17th century, which led into the Maunder Minimum. We use a low-resolution version of Max Planck Institute for Meteorology's model MPI-ESM, to assimilate the PAGES 2K continental temperature reconstructions. In the off-line approach the ensemble for the entire simulation period is generated first and then the ensemble is used in combination with the empirical information to produce the analysis. In contrast, in the on-line approach the ensembles are generated sequentially for sub-periods based on the analysis of previous sub-periods. Both schemes perform better than the simulations without DA. The on-line method would be expected to perform better if the assimilation led to states of the slow components of the climate system that are close to reality and the system had sufficient memory to propagate this information forward in time. In our comparison, which is based on analysing correlations and differences between the analysis and the proxy-based reconstructions, we find similar skill for both methods on continental and the hemispheric scales. This indicates either a lack of control of the slow components in our setup or a lack of information propagation on decadal timescales. Although the skill is similar and the on-line method is more difficult to implement, the temporal consistency of the analysis in on-line method makes it in general preferable.
机译:最近已经采用了不同的基于集合的数据同化(DA)方法进行古气候重建,但是尚未尝试进行系统比较。我们比较了离线和在线集成方法,测试时期是17世纪,这导致了Maunder Minimum。我们使用马克斯普朗克气象研究所的MPI-ESM模型的低分辨率版本来吸收PAGES 2K大陆温度重建。在离线方法中,首先生成整个模拟周期的集合,然后将该集合与经验信息结合使用以进行分析。相反,在在线方法中,基于先前子时段的分析,针对子时段顺序地生成合奏。两种方案的性能均优于没有DA的仿真。如果同化导致气候系统慢速组件的状态接近现实,并且系统具有足够的内存来及时传播此信息,则在线方法将有望表现更好。在我们的比较中,它是基于对分析与基于代理的重建之间的相关性和差异进行分析的,我们发现大陆和半球尺度的两种方法都具有相似的技巧。这表明要么缺乏对我们设置中的慢速组件的控制,要么缺乏以年代为单位的时间尺度上的信息传播。尽管技术类似并且在线方法更难以实施,但是在线方法中分析的时间一致性使其总体上是优选的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号