We assessed whether any household dust reduction intervention has the effect of increasing or decreasing the development or severity of atopic disease. Electronic searches o'/> A systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions used to reduce exposure to house dust and their effect on the development and severity of asthma
首页> 外文期刊>Ciencia e Saude Coletiva >A systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions used to reduce exposure to house dust and their effect on the development and severity of asthma
【24h】

A systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions used to reduce exposure to house dust and their effect on the development and severity of asthma

机译:对减少屋尘接触及其对哮喘发展和严重程度的影响的干预措施的系统回顾和荟萃分析

获取原文
           

摘要

> size="2" face="Verdana">We assessed whether any household dust reduction intervention has the effect of increasing or decreasing the development or severity of atopic disease. Electronic searches on household intervention and atopic disease were conducted in 2007 in EMBASE, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. We included randomized controlled trials comparing asthma outcomes in a household intervention group with either placebo intervention or no intervention. Meta-analyses on the prevention studies found that the interventions made no difference to the onset of wheeze but made a significant reduction in physician-diagnosed asthma. Meta-analysis of lung function outcomes indicated no improvement due to the interventions but found a reduction in symptom days. Qualitatively, health care was used less in those receiving interventions. However, in one study that compared intervention, placebo, and control arms, the reduction in heath care use was similar in the placebo and intervention arms. This review suggests that there is not sufficient evidence to suggest implementing hygiene measures in an attempt to improve outcomes in existing atopic disease, but interventions from birth in those at high risk of atopy are useful in preventing diagnosed asthma but not parental-reported wheeze.
机译:> size =“ 2” face =“ Verdana”>我们评估了任何家庭减尘干预措施是否具有增加或减少特应性疾病的发展或严重程度的作用。 2007年,在EMBASE,MEDLINE和Cochrane对照试验中央登记册中进行了有关家庭干预和特应性疾病的电子搜索。我们纳入了一项随机对照试验,比较了家庭干预组与安慰剂干预组或无干预组的哮喘结局。预防研究的荟萃分析发现,干预措施对喘息的发作没有影响,但大大降低了医生诊断的哮喘。对肺功能结果的荟萃分析表明,由于干预没有改善,但发现症状天数减少。从质量上讲,接受干预的人较少使用医疗保健。但是,在一项比较干预,安慰剂和对照组的研究中,健康护理使用的减少在安慰剂和干预组中相似。这项审查表明,没有足够的证据表明采取卫生措施以改善现有特应性疾病的结局,但对患有特应性高危人群的分娩干预措施可用于预防确诊的哮喘,但不能预防父母报告的喘息。 / font>

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号