首页> 外文期刊>Chemistry Education Research and Practice >Does a course on the history and philosophy of chemistry have any effect on prospective chemistry teachersa?? perceptions? The case of chemistry and the chemist
【24h】

Does a course on the history and philosophy of chemistry have any effect on prospective chemistry teachersa?? perceptions? The case of chemistry and the chemist

机译:化学历史和哲学课程对未来的化学老师有什么影响吗?看法?化学与化学家

获取原文
           

摘要

The creative comparisons prospective chemistry teachers make about a??chemistrya?? and the a??chemista?? may reflect how they perceive these concepts. In this sense, it seems important to determine which creative comparisons prospective teachers make with respect to these and how these can change after the history of chemistry is treated in the classroom. This study seeks to investigate the impact of the basic History and Philosophy of Chemistry course on prospective chemistry teachersa?? perceptions towards chemistry and the chemist. The study was conducted during the 2012a??2013 academic year at a state university in Turkey with 38 prospective chemistry teachers. A creative comparisons questionnaire and semi-structured interviews were used as data collection instruments in the study. This questionnaire was administered to the prospective teachers in the form of a pre-test, post-test, and retention test. Results of the analysis showed that the prospective teachers produced creative comparisons related to chemistry in the pre-test that mostly relied on their own experiences and observations, but that in the post-test and retention test, their comparisons mostly contained references to the role of chemistry in daily life, its development, and its facilitating aspects. Similarly, it was observed that in the pre-test, the prospective teachers made creative comparisons regarding the chemist that related mostly to the laboratory, but that the post-test and retention test rather contained the aspects of chemists as researchers, meticulous persons, facilitators and managers. Also, 18 prospective teachers were engaged in interviews to understand their prior knowledge about chemistry and the chemist, as well as the reasons for the changes in their creative comparisons. The results of the interviews indicated that a large majority of the prospective teachers were able to fully reflect on their inadequacy about their previous knowledge about a??chemistrya?? and a??chemist,a?? and it was seen that they could explain the reason they changed their creative comparisons as an outcome of the History and Philosophy of Chemistry course. In the light of these results, it can be said that the History and Philosophy of Chemistry course may help prospective chemistry teachers in their perceptions about both chemistry and the chemist and may add depth to their knowledge.
机译:准化学老师关于“化学”的创造性比较。和一个?可能反映出他们如何看待这些概念。从这个意义上讲,确定准教师针对这些内容进行哪些创造性的比较以及在课堂上处理化学史后如何改变这些内容似乎很重要。本研究旨在调查基础化学史和哲学课程对预期化学教师的影响a?对化学和化学家的看法。这项研究是在2012a?2013学年期间在土耳其的一所国立大学进行的,其中有38名准化学老师。一项创造性的比较问卷和半结构化访谈被用作研究中的数据收集工具。该问卷以预测试,后测试和保留测试的形式向准教师进行了调查。分析结果表明,准教师在考试前进行了与化学相关的创造性比较,主要是依靠自己的经验和观察结果,但是在后期测试和保留测试中,他们的比较大多包含了对化学作用的参考。日常生活中的化学,其发展及其促进因素。同样,可以观察到,在预测试中,准教师对与实验室有关的化学家进行了创造性的比较,但测试后和保留测试却包含了化学家作为研究人员,细心人,促进者的各个方面。和经理。此外,还邀请了18位准教师进行访谈,以了解他们先前对化学和化学家的了解,以及他们的创造性比较发生变化的原因。访谈的结果表明,大多数准教师能够充分反映出他们对以前关于“化学”的知识的不足。还有一位化学家可以看出,他们可以解释化学史和哲学课程改变了他们的创造性比较的原因。根据这些结果,可以说化学史和哲学课程可以帮助准化学老师对化学和化学家的理解,并可以加深他们的知识。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号