首页> 外文期刊>Chemistry central journal >Rings or daggers, axes or fibulae have a different composition? A multivariate study on Central Italy bronzes from eneolithic to early iron age
【24h】

Rings or daggers, axes or fibulae have a different composition? A multivariate study on Central Italy bronzes from eneolithic to early iron age

机译:戒指或匕首,斧头或腓骨的成分不同?对意大利中部从青铜时代到铁器时代的青铜的多变量研究

获取原文
       

摘要

Background One of the main concerns for archaeo-metallurgists and archaeologists is to determine to what extent ancient craftsmen understood the effect of metal alloy composition and were able to control it in order to produce objects with the most suitable features. This problem can be investigated by combining compositional analyses of a high number of ancient artefacts with correlation analyses of the objects’ age, production site, destination of usage etc. – and thus chemometric data treatment is carried out. In this study, multivariate analyses were performed on a matrix composed of elemental compositional data from 134 archaeological bronze objects, obtained by XRF analyses. Analysed objects have been dated back from the Eneolithic Period to the end of the Bronze Age including the early Iron Age and were excavated in Central Italy (mainly Abruzzo Region). Results Chemometric analysis was performed attempting to visualise clouds of objects through PCA. In parallel and independently, object grouping was attempted using several different approaches, based on object characteristics (e.g. shape, weight, type of use – cutting or hitting and age) following indications given by archaeologists (or derived from the archaeological context). Furthermore, case-tailored data pretreatment (logratio-centred scaling) was used, but no homogeneous groups could be identified. Conclusions By using chemometric data analysis, homogeneous groups of objects could not be detected, meaning that compositional data of alloys is not correlated with the considered objects’ characteristics. This favours the conclusion that – without discussing the ascertained ability of ancient foundry-men - they had also already discovered the convenience of recycling broken objects thus producing a more or less similar bronze alloy each time, depending on materials’ availability; necessary mechanical characteristics could then be obtained by post processing.
机译:背景技术考古学家和考古学家最关心的问题之一是确定古代工匠在多大程度上了解金属合金成分的影响并能够对其进行控制,以生产出具有最合适特征的物体。可以通过将大量古代文物的成分分析与对象的年龄,生产地点,使用地点等的相关性分析相结合来研究此问题,从而进行化学计量数据处理。在这项研究中,对由XRF分析获得的134个考古青铜物体的元素成分数据组成的矩阵进行了多元分析。分析对象的时间可以追溯到从石器时代到青铜时代的末期,包括早期的铁器时代,并在意大利中部(主要是阿布鲁佐地区)发掘。结果进行了化学计量分析,试图通过PCA可视化物体的云。平行且独立地,根据考古学家给出的指示(或源自考古背景),根据对象特征(例如,形状,重量,使用类型–切割或击中以及年龄),使用几种不同的方法对对象进行分组。此外,使用了按案例量身定做的数据预处理(以对数为中心的缩放),但无法识别出同类组。结论通过化学计量学数据分析,无法检测到均匀的物体组,这意味着合金的成分数据与所考虑的物体特性无关。这就得出了这样的结论:在不讨论古代铸造工人确定的能力的情况下,他们还已经发现了回收破碎物体的便利性,从而根据材料的可用性每次生产或多或少相似的青铜合金。然后可以通过后处理获得必要的机械特性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号