首页> 外文期刊>Chiropractic and Manual Therapies >Chiropractors’ attitudes toward drug prescription rights: a narrative review
【24h】

Chiropractors’ attitudes toward drug prescription rights: a narrative review

机译:脊医对药物处方权的态度:叙事评论

获取原文
           

摘要

Background The right to prescribe drugs remains a contentious issue within the chiropractic profession. Nevertheless, drug prescription by manual therapy providers is currently an important topic. Notably, physiotherapists in the United Kingdom were recently granted limited independent prescribing rights. Reports suggest that physiotherapists in Australia now want those same rights, and as such a review of chiropractors? general attitudes toward drug prescription is needed. Objective To examine the literature concerning chiropractors? attitudes toward drug prescription rights and to compare the opinions of chiropractors currently licensed to prescribe medication with those in the profession who are not. Methods This was a narrative review, consisting of a formal literature search and summary of included articles. Electronic databases searched included the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PubMed, and the Index to Chiropractic Literature. Inclusion criteria consisted of prospective studies published in English in peer-reviewed journals. Studies were required to contain data on chiropractors? opinions toward medication prescription rights. Results Of 33 articles identified, a total of seven surveys were included in the review. Of these, there was a general split in opinion among chiropractors regarding the right to prescribe drugs in chiropractic practice. Those supportive of prescribing rights favoured a limited number of over-the-counter and/or prescription-based medications such as analgesics, anti-inflammatories, and muscle relaxants. When questioned on full prescribing rights, however, chiropractors were generally opposed. In jurisdictions where chiropractors are currently licensed to prescribe from a limited formulary, such as in Switzerland, the majority perceived this right as an advantage for the profession. Moreover, continuing education in pharmacology was viewed as a necessary component of this privilege. Conclusions Based on the literature to date there is a general split in chiropractors? attitudes toward drug prescription rights. This split is most pronounced in countries where chiropractors are not licensed to prescribe medications. Notwithstanding, this is an important topic in chiropractic currently and warrants both further discussion and research to determine future directions and the implications of either pursuit or denial of prescription rights by chiropractors. Future surveys and/or qualitative studies of other chiropractors? opinions toward gaining prescription privileges would be timely.
机译:背景处方药的权利仍然在脊椎治疗界引起争议。然而,手动治疗提供者开出的药物处方目前是一个重要的话题。值得注意的是,英国的物理治疗师最近获得了有限的独立开处方权。报告表明,澳大利亚的物理治疗师现在希望获得同样的权利,因此对脊椎治疗师的审查如此吗?需要对药物处方有一般的态度。目的探讨有关脊医的文献资料?对药物处方权的态度,以及将目前已获许可开处方的脊医与未从事该行业的脊医的观点进行比较。方法这是一个叙述性评论,包括正式的文献检索和包括的文章摘要。搜索的电子数据库包括《护理和相关健康文献的累积索引》,《 PubMed》和《脊骨疗法索引》。入选标准包括在同行评审期刊上以英语发表的前瞻性研究。是否需要进行研究以包含有关脊医的数据?对药物处方权的意见。结果在确定的33篇文章中,总共进行了7项调查。其中,脊医在就脊椎疗法开药的权利上存在普遍分歧。那些支持开立权利的人赞成有限数量的非处方药和/或处方药,例如止痛药,消炎药和肌肉松弛药。当被问到充分的处方权时,脊医通常被反对。在目前已获许可从有限处方开处方的脊椎治疗师所在的司法管辖区中,例如在瑞士,大多数人认为此权利是该行业的优势。此外,继续进行药理学教育被视为该特权的必要组成部分。结论根据迄今为止的文献,脊医普遍存在分歧。对药物处方权的态度。在脊医没有被许可开处方的国家中,这种分歧最为明显。尽管如此,这仍然是脊椎治疗学中的一个重要主题,需要进行进一步的讨论和研究,以确定未来的方向以及脊医寻求或拒绝处方权的含义。其他脊医的未来调查和/或定性研究?获得处方特权的意见将是及时的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号