...
首页> 外文期刊>Chiropractic and Manual Therapies >The effect of spinal manipulative therapy on spinal range of motion: a systematic literature review
【24h】

The effect of spinal manipulative therapy on spinal range of motion: a systematic literature review

机译:脊柱手法治疗对脊柱运动范围的影响:系统文献综述

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background Spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) has been shown to have an effect on spine-related pain, both clinically and in experimentally induced pain. However, it is unclear if it has an immediate noticeable biomechanical effect on spinal motion that can be measured in terms of an increased range of motion (ROM). Objective To assess the quality of the literature and to determine whether or not SMT is associated with an immediate increase in ROM. Design A systematic critical literature review. Method Systematic searches were performed in Pubmed, the Cochrane Library and EMBASE using terms relating to manipulation, movement and the spine. Selection of articles was made according to specific criteria by two independent reviewers. Two checklists were created based on the needs of the present review. Articles were independently reviewed by two reviewers. Articles were given quality scores and the data synthesized for each region treated in the literature. Findings were summarized in tables and reported in a narrative fashion. Results Fifteen articles were retained reporting on experiments on the neck, lumbar spine, hip and jaw. The mean quality score was 71/100 (ranges 33/100 - 92/100). A positive effect of SMT was reported in both studies where mouth opening was assessed after cervical manipulation. In five of the nine studies on cervical ROM a positive effect was reported, whereas the remaining four studies did not show improvement. None of the three studies of the lumbar spine showed an effect of SMT on lumbar ROMs and one study of sacroiliac manipulation reported no effect on the ROM of the hip joint. In relation to the quality score, the seven highest ranked studies, showed significant positive effects of SMT on ROM. Continuing down the list, the other studies reported no significant differences in the outcomes between groups. Conclusion SMT seems sometimes to have a small effect on ROM, at least in the cervical spine. Further research should concentrate on areas of the spine that have the potential of actually improving to such a degree that a change can be easily uncovered.
机译:背景技术脊椎手法治疗(SMT)在临床和实验性疼痛中均显示出对脊柱相关性疼痛的作用。但是,尚不清楚它对脊柱运动是否具有立即明显的生物力学作用,可以通过增加运动范围(ROM)来衡量。目的评估文献的质量并确定SMT是否与ROM的立即增加有关。设计系统的批判性文献综述。方法在Pubmed,Cochrane Library和EMBASE中使用与操纵,运动和脊柱有关的术语进行系统搜索。由两名独立审稿人根据特定标准对文章进行选择。根据本次审查的需要创建了两个清单。文章由两名审稿人独立审阅。为文章提供了质量得分,并对文献中处理的每个区域的数据进行了综合。调查结果汇总在表格中,并以叙述方式进行报告。结果保留15篇关于颈部,腰椎,臀部和下颌的实验的报道。平均质量得分为71/100(范围为33/100-92/100)。在两项研究中均报告了SMT的积极作用,在宫颈手术后评估了张口性。在9项关于子宫颈ROM的研究中,有5项报告了阳性结果,而其余4项研究未见改善。腰椎的三项研究均未显示SMT对腰部ROM有影响,and关节操作的一项研究未报告对髋关节ROM有影响。关于质量得分,排名最高的七个研究表明SMT对ROM具有明显的积极作用。紧随其后的是其他研究,各组之间的结果无显着差异。结论SMT有时似乎对ROM影响很小,至少在颈椎中是如此。进一步的研究应该集中在脊椎区域,这些区域实际上可能会改善到很容易发现变化的程度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号